arXiv AI

Self-Guided Adaptive Safety Alignment: Synthesizing and Internalizing Guidelines in Reasoning Models

arXiv:2511. 21214v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Explicit safety policies can improve reasoning-model safety, but their effective coverage may lag behind evolving jailbreak strategies.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

ReFrame is a training‑free framework that enhances safety alignment for multimodal large language models at test time. It uses two lightweight agents: one generates risk and utility evidence, and the other rewrites prompts and routes images to create a safe proxy before invoking the deployed MLLM. Experiments show that ReFrame improves jailbreak defense, safety awareness, and reduces over‑sensitivity while maintaining multimodal utility.

By Wenzheng Jiang, Xuankun Rong, Yuanzhao Zhai, Dawei Feng, Huaimin Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Large Reasoning Models Learn Better Alignment from Flawed Thinking

Large reasoning models generate chain-of-thought (CoT) before answering but struggle with safety alignment and can be misled by flawed premises. The paper introduces RECAP, a reinforcement learning approach that trains models to override flawed reasoning paths and produce safe, helpful responses without extra training cost. RECAP improves safety, jailbreak robustness, and reduces overrefusal while preserving core reasoning abilities and inference token budget.

By ShengYun Peng, Pin-Yu Chen, Eric Smith, Song Jiang, Hongyuan Zhan, Haozhu Wang, Mahesh Pasupuleti, Duen Horng Chau, Jianfeng Chi
arXiv AI
Sep 7

The Struggle Between Continuation and Refusal: A Mechanistic Analysis of the Continuation-Triggered Jailbreak in LLMs

The paper investigates a continuation-triggered jailbreak in large language models, showing that moving an instruction suffix can markedly boost jailbreak success. By performing mechanistic interpretability at the attention‑head level, the authors reveal that the jailbreak arises from a competition between the model’s natural continuation drive and safety defenses learned during alignment. They introduce Head Competition Steering (HCS), an inference‑time technique that exploits this competition to suppress harmful outputs and distill the approach into a student model for efficient safety improvements.

By Yonghong Deng, Zhen Yang, Ping Jian, Xinyue Zhang, Zhongbin Guo, Chengzhi Li, Junxi Yin