arXiv AI

ACC: Compiling Agent Trajectories for Long-Context Training

arXiv:2605. 21850v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent development of agents has renewed demand for long-context reasoning capacity of LLMs.

arXiv Computation and Language

Aug 31

ContextPilot: Teaching Agents for Proactive Context Management via Fine-grained RL

ContextPilot is a proactive context‑management framework designed to improve long‑horizon agentic reasoning with large language models. It expands the toolset to include planning, long‑term memory, and soft context offloading, and introduces a reinforcement‑learning strategy that focuses on critical editing decisions and assigns action‑level advantages. Experiments on long‑context QA and deep search tasks demonstrate that ContextPilot achieves stronger performance with a more compact working context, outperforming existing baselines across various base models and benchmarks.

By Zhuoshi Pan, Qizhi Pei, Junru Lu, Honglin Lin, H. Vicky Zhao, Di Yin, Xing Sun

llms agents nlp reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Sep 10

AttnCompress: Dynamic Attention-Guided Trajectory Compression for Software Engineering Agents

arXiv:2609.08318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The transition from human-centric assistance to Autonomous Software Engineering (ASE) agents has enabled the resolution of complex real-world SE task...

By Zhengran Zeng, Yixin Li, Rui Xie, Wei Ye, Shikun Zhang

llms agents computer-vision efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Aug 21

MidTool: Mid-training Data Synthesis for Agentic Tool Use

arXiv:2608. 20314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mid-training is increasingly recognized as a critical stage for shaping the capabilities of large language models.

By Fengqing Jiang, Yite Wang, Boyi Liu, Zhaoyang Wang, Canwen Xu, Zhewei Yao, Radha Poovendran, Yuxiong He

llms agents reinforcement-learning fine-tuning

arXiv AI

Jul 21

From Evidence to Trajectory: Abductive Reasoning Path Synthesis for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agents Development

arXiv:2509. 23071v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agent development is hindered by the lack of executable ground-truth agent-environment interaction trajectories.

By Muzhi Li, Jinhu Qi, Yihong Wu, Minghao Zhao, Liheng Ma, Yifan Li, Xinyu Wang, Zhenghan Tai, Zixing Song, Yingxue Zhang, Ho-fung Leung, Irwin King

llms rag agents nlp reinforcement-learning fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv Computation and Language

Sep 16

Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act

The paper investigates how reinforcement learning can cause large language model agents to adopt shortcut policies for tool use, relying on superficial prompt cues rather than actual task needs. By creating synthetic environments that mix factual QA and math reasoning, the authors show that agents often invoke tools when cues are present, even when those tools are unnecessary, with spurious invocation rates rising up to 39%. They find that shortcut learning occurs mainly when agents have already mastered the target tool and that semantic alignment between cues and tools amplifies the effect. To counter this, they propose a dense, decision-level reward where an LLM judge assesses tool necessity, which reduces cue-driven tool use while maintaining performance.

By Yiwei Yang, Haoxiang Zhang, Bingbing Wen, Yao Lu, Yuchen Wu, Lei Zhang, Julian McAuley, Pan Lu, Bill Howe

llms agents nlp reinforcement-learning safety

arXiv AI

Jul 23

PRO-LONG: Programmatic Memory Enables Long-Horizon Reasoning

arXiv:2607. 20064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon tasks require sustained perception, reasoning, and exploration, and are a persistent challenge for large language model (LLM) agents.

By Alexis Fox, Junlin Wang, Paul Rosu, Bhuwan Dhingra

llms agents benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 16

Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale

arXiv:2606. 15079v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Efficient and scalable agentic intelligence requires models that can deliver both low-latency responses and strong reasoning capabilities while remaining practical to train, serve, and deploy.

By Ang Li, Ben Liu, Bin Han, Bin Hu, Bin Jing, Binbin Hu, Bing Li, Cai Chen, Caizhi Tang, Changxin Tian, Chao Huang, Chao Zhang, Chen Liang, Chen Qian, Chengfu Tang, Chengyao Wen, Chilin Fu, Chunwei Wu, Cong Zhang, Cunyin Peng, Daixin Wang, Dalong Zhang, Deng Zhao, Dingnan Jin, Dingyuan Zhu, Donghao Zhang, Fan Yuan, Fangzheng Zhao, Fanzhuang Meng, Feifan Wu, Feng Xu, Fengbin Fang, Gangshan Wang, Guodong Yang, Hailin Zhao, Haitao Wang, Haitao Zhang, Hanxiao Zhang, Hanzi Wang, Hao Dai, Hao Liu, Hao Qian, Hao Wu, Haoxiong Liu, Haoyu Xu, Heng Zhang, Hong Liu, Hongliang Zhang, Hongrui Liu, Hongxun Li, Hongzhi Ruan, Huaidong Xiong, Huihuang Zheng, Huikang Tang, Jia Guo, Jia Li, Jia Liu, Jiameng Wang, Jiaming Liu, Jiannan Shi, Jianping Wei, Jiaolong Yang, Jiapeng Wang, Jie Gao, Jie Wang, Jiewei Wu, Jin Yang, Jinjin Li, Jinjing Huang, Jinquan Sun, Jinyao Chen, Juanhui Tu, Jun Liu, Jun Mei, Jun Xu, Jun Zhou, Junjie Ou, Junnan Sipan, Junpeng Fang, Kaihong Zhang, Kaiqin Hu, Ke Shi, Kuan Xu, Kun Tang, Kunlong Chen, Lanyin Mei, Lei Chen, Lei Liang, Lei Xu, Li Tang, Liang Jiang, Liangcheng Fu, Lihui Zhang, Linfeng Shi, Lintao Ma, Liyuan Liu, Longfei Li, Longfei Zheng, Lu Liu, Lu Yu, Man Li, Meiqi Zhu, Meng Li, Mengjie Gao, Mengshu Sun, Mingming Yin, Mingyang Zhang, Mingyuan Fan, Nuo Xu, Pan Tang, Peijie Jiang, Peilong Zhao, Peng Lin, Pingping Liu, Qi Zuo, Qian Zhao, Qiang Cheng, Qianggang Cao, Qiaoben Bao, Qing Cui, Qingyuan Yang, Qitao Shi, Qiyin Huang, Qizheng Zhou, Quan Wan, Runyuan Zhao, Shaomian Zheng, Shaowei Wei, Shengnan Zhang, Shuaicheng Li, Shujie Li, Shuo Zhang, Sikang Bian, Tianchu Yao, Tiange Xu, Tianshu Wang, Ting Guo, Tinghao Wang, Tingwei Huang, Tong Zhao, Tongkai Yang, Wang Hong, Wanli Gu, Wei Lu, Weichang Wu, Weiguang Han, Weiquan Li, Wenbo Shen, Wenjing Fang, Wenzhi Tang, Xiang Shu, Xiao Shi, Xiaodong Yan, Xiaolu Zhang, Xiaopei Wan, Xiaqing Sun, Xin Zhao, Xingyu Lu, Xinxing Yang, Xinyao Tang, Xinyu Kong, Xinyu Liu, Xiong Xu, Xuan Sun, Xudong Han, Xudong Wang, Xujie Shen, Yalin Zhang, Yangyang Hou, Yankun Ren, Yao Zhao, Ye Chen, Yeyang Chen, Yibo Cao, Yifan Zuo, Yijie Chen, Ying Li, Yingjie Song, Yingxue Li, Yiqi Wang, Yixuan Sun, Yizhu Xiao, Yongfei Xu, Yu Liu, Yuchen Fang, Yue Gao, Yue Yu, Yue Zhang, Yuqi Zhang, Yuxiao He, Yuxiao Lu, Yuxin Tian, Yuxuan Li, Yuzhuo Fu, Zhankai Xu, Zhaoxin Huan, Zhenduo Zhang, Zhengke Gui, Zhengyu Huang, Zhenjun Ma, Zhenxuan Pan, Zheping Qu, Zhibo Zhu, Zhidong Fan, Zhigang Huangfu, Zhihao Wang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zhizhen Liu, Zhuyan Zhou, Zibin Lin, Zihang Zeng, Zihao Wang, Zilong Wang, Ziqi Liu, Zitao Xuan, Zixuan Cheng, Zujie Wen, Zuoli Tang

agents reinforcement-learning efficiency safety

arXiv AI

Jul 20

ToolVerse: Unlocking Massive Environments and Long-Horizon Tasks for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2607. 15660v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While LLM agents demonstrate strong reasoning abilities in compact and well-defined scenarios, they struggle to maintain robustness and effectiveness when faced with large-scale, diverse, and dynamic real-world environments that demand seamless tool integration.

By Shuaiyu Zhou, Fengpeng Yue, Zengjie Hu, Yuanzhe Shen, Chenyang Zhang, feng hong, Cao Liu, Ke Zeng

llms agents reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Sep 3

UniToolCall: Unifying Tool-Use Representation, Data, and Evaluation for LLM Agents

UniToolCall introduces a unified framework for tool-use in large language model agents, standardizing toolset construction, dataset generation, and evaluation. The framework aggregates over 22,000 tools and creates a hybrid training corpus of more than 390,000 instances by combining ten public datasets with synthetically generated, structurally controlled trajectories. It models diverse interaction patterns—single‑hop vs. multi‑hop, single‑turn vs. multi‑turn, serial vs. parallel execution—and adds an Anchor Linkage mechanism to enforce cross‑turn dependencies, while converting seven public benchmarks into a common Query–Action–Observation–Answer format for fine‑grained evaluation.

By Yijuan Liang, Xinghao Chen, Yifan Ge, Ziyi Wu, Hao Wu, Changyu Zeng, Wei Xing, Xiaoyu Shen

llms agents fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jun 4

Adaptive Minds: Empowering Agents with LoRA-as-Tools

arXiv:2510. 15416v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate a framework in which LoRA adapters are treated as callable tools that a base language model can dynamically select and invoke.

By Pavan C Shekar, Aswanth Krishnan

llms agents fine-tuning benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 24

AREX: Towards a Recursively Self-Improving Agent for Deep Research

arXiv:2607. 21461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research requires agents to find answers that jointly satisfy multiple constraints.

By Shuqi Lu, Chaofan Li, Kun Luo, Zhang Zhang, Hui Wang, Hongwang Xiao, Zheng Liu, Lei Xiong, Jiahao Wang, Sen Wang, Xiyan Jiang, Wanli Li, Yuyang Hu, Hongjin Qian, Bingyu Yan, Ziyi Xia, Yingxia Shao, Kang Liu, Zhicheng Dou, Di He, Chaozhuo Li, Qiwei Ye, Zhongyuan Wang, Zheng Liu

agents reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv Computation and Language

Sep 2

Compile, Don't Memorize: A Context Compilation Architecture (CCA) for In-Context Learning

arXiv:2609.00759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output s...

By Jinhu Qi, Minda Hu, Wentao Zhang, Weiqiang Jin, Yanyu Chen, Junli Wang, Irwin King

llms agents reinforcement-learning benchmarks

Related stories