The study evaluates how nineteenth‑century scholarship—specifically Pressutti’s regesta and partial editions—can aid handwritten text recognition (HTR) of Pope Honorius III’s registers beyond the limited modern expert transcriptions available for regnal years 1‑2. By aligning legacy layers with modern source lines, the authors demonstrate that projection onto curial spelling with replay reduces word‑error rate by 1.50 points, that a legacy lexicon covers 82.2 % of out‑of‑vocabulary words and flags errors with 66.7 % precision, and that a distilled medieval NER model achieves an F1 of 82.1 % on a validated benchmark. Additionally, Pressutti’s regesta and related topological data recover 73.9 % of entry starts and suggest a character‑error rate of 7.80 % beyond folio 203, indicating that antiquarian scholarship can steer, check, and segment HTR rather than replace modern transcription.
By Tamas Kovacs, Daniel Luger
arXiv:2610.35085v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Unlocking medieval archives at scale is bottlenecked by the cost of line-level diplomatic transcriptions and manual abbreviation expansion. Focusing on...
By Tamas Kovacs, Daniel Luger
Wieszcz‑XIX is a 6.75‑billion‑token corpus of Polish texts from 1800‑1918, comprising 3.1 billion words across 294,369 documents, assembled from Wolne Lektury and the Internet Archive. The pipeline filters, deduplicates, audits for post‑1918 leakage, and splits at the document level, yielding a training set with only 0.04–0.38 % post‑1918 residue. From this corpus the authors train decoder‑only language models ranging from 47 M to 349 M parameters, demonstrating that larger models better preserve period spelling and exhibit temporal boundedness compared to modern Polish baselines.
By Szymon Kocur
arXiv:2608.03617v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The personal archive of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935) is held as fond 555 of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The archive...
By Vladimir Beskorovainyi
arXiv:2609.37755v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Purpose: Most Greek papyri remain unpublished and undigitised; a handwritten text recognition (HTR) pipeline that transcribes them automatically would...
By Anton Repushko, Elena Chepel
arXiv:2607. 08143v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present the results of HIPE-OCRepair-2026, an ICDAR competition on LLM-assisted OCR post-correction of historical documents.
By Maud Ehrmann, Emanuela Boros, Juri Opitz, Andrianos Michail, Florian Wagner, Simon Clematide
This study tackles the challenge of identifying essay‑scale republication and reuse from fragmented text evidence, focusing on David Hume essays in eighteenth‑century books and newspapers. It compares a staged rule‑based workflow, baseline decision‑tree and LLM approaches, and automated rule adaptation, finding that pair‑level feature aggregation achieves high F1 scores and that the final workflow offers the best precision‑recall balance. Manual audits confirm all predicted positives as genuine republications, demonstrating the method’s effectiveness in producing compact, auditable candidate sets for historical analysis.
By Ke Shu, Kira Hinderks, Eetu M\"akel\"a, Mikko Tolonen
arXiv:2610.20461v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Character Error Rate (CER), the standard metric for OCR and vision-language models (VLMs), charges a typo as much as a wrong name. We introduce semCER,...
By Nguyen Nguyen, Yongyi Zang
Character Error Rate (CER), the standard metric for OCR and vision-language models (VLMs), charges a typo as much as a wrong name. We introduce semCER, which keeps CER's alignment and denominator and...
arXiv:2608. 19385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Historical Arabic manuscript transcription is not only a recognition problem.
By Abdullah Ahmed Ali, Mohammed Thamer Abdulhadi, Ali Haider Safaa, Dhulfiqar Mahdi Wadi
The paper audits a 366‑day autobiographical book generated by a large language model (LLM) against an independent verification corpus. Using a four‑level rubric, 354 of the 366 days (96.7%) failed verification, with only 12 days containing corroborated scenes and 19 days containing actively contradicted claims. Regenerating the same days with current models yielded 100% verification failure, while grounding the generation in the subject’s own corpus improved the rate to 83.3% but still left substantial residual failure.
By Heather Renze
The paper investigates how different published texts for diabetic retinopathy grading—specifically four versions of an international scale and an Italian guideline—lead to gaps, overlaps, and silent repairs when interpreted literally. By transcribing these texts into a unified rule language and exhaustively enumerating over 1.4 billion finding profiles, the authors show that each text leaves some eyes uncategorized, that the 2017 tabulation contains an empty proliferative class and a macular gap absent in the 2003 text, and that English and Italian texts can order the same eyes differently. Experiments on annotated photographs and language‑model responses further reveal significant disagreements in referral decisions and persistent silent repairs even when models are instructed to read literally.
By Elisa Rovai, Fabio Rovai