arXiv AI

OptoAgent: A Trustworthy Multi-Agent Framework for Opportunistic Vision Micro-Screening in Classroom Environments

OptoAgent is a multi‑agent framework called SightSentinel that transforms a classroom wall display into a continuous vision screening tool. It embeds short, calibrated optotype probes into ordinary educational content, and eight specialized agents analyze each encounter to recover viewing distance, recognition accuracy, gaze stability, and other metrics. A quality agent filters out poor data, a longitudinal agent builds a child‑specific baseline, and an orchestrator produces a Vision Concern Score that is routed through a safety gate to avoid diagnosis or prescription. "whyItMatters":"The system aims to detect vision problems earlier and more reliably than periodic school screenings by leveraging everyday classroom interactions and automated, low‑cost data collection."

arXiv AI
Oct 31

VeriCUA: Verification as Agentic Exploration for Computer-Using Agents

VeriCUA is a platform-agnostic framework that treats verification of computer-using agents as dynamic evidence gathering and assessment. It constructs a task rubric from available context, then selects GUI or code checks to resolve unmet requirements and combines their findings under explicit evidence rules. Experiments demonstrate that VeriCUA achieves higher agreement with reference labels than baseline methods, especially on hard offline cases and in rejecting false completion claims online.

By Qiushi Sun, Da Yu, Alexander Knop, Amer Sinha, Lingpeng Kong, Ben Kao, Ravi Kumar, Pritish Kamath
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Beyond the Verdict: Evidence-Aligned Evaluation of Visual Prompt-Injection Guardrails

The paper introduces Mind2Web-Injection, a benchmark of 9,954 instruction‑screenshot pairs designed to evaluate whether vision‑language models (VLMs) use visual evidence when judging conflicts between on‑screen text and user instructions. Across six VLMs, models with similar overall precision can differ dramatically in Evidence‑Aligned Detection (EAD), revealing that verdict‑only metrics miss critical grounding failures. The authors also propose two training‑free interventions—ReadGate and CmdCompare—to improve evidence grounding and instruction‑command consistency, and argue for separate reporting of verdict correctness, evidence localization, and counterfactual responsiveness.

By Suyoung Lee, Myungsub Choi
arXiv AI
Aug 12

MIRA: Medical Image Reflection for Agentic Diagnosis

arXiv:2608. 10827v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical visual agents can use tools to inspect images and retrieve external knowledge, but indiscriminate tool use may introduce noisy or misleading evidence.

By Shengzhi Wang, Jun Yang, Kai Wu, Xiaozhong Ji, Yiwen Ye, Ziyang Chen, Mingliang Xiong, Wen Fang, Mingqing Liu, Mengyuan Xu, Miaoxuan Shan, Caiyan Liu, Bin He, Qingwen Liu
arXiv AI
Jul 29

ProcAgent: An Agentic Framework for Procedural Task Guidance on Edge with Human-in-the-Loop

arXiv:2607. 24770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Procedural tasks such as furniture assembly and home repair impose substantial cognitive demands because users must interpret instructions, track task progress, reason about spatial state, and recover from errors while performing physical actions.

By Azizul Zahid, Subrata Biswas, Bashima Islam, Sai Swaminathan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 29

VeriCUA: Verification as Agentic Exploration for Computer-Using Agents

VeriCUA is a platform-agnostic framework that verifies computer-using agents by treating verification as dynamic evidence gathering and assessment. It constructs a task rubric from available context, then selects GUI or code checks to resolve unmet requirements, combining findings under explicit evidence rules. Experiments demonstrate higher agreement with reference labels than baselines, especially on hard offline cases and in rejecting false completion claims online.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 16

RSIgen: Reciprocal Self-Improvement for Agentic Visual Generation

RSIgen is a task‑centric reciprocal self‑improvement framework for agentic visual generation that coordinates learning allocation, supervision refresh, and recursive curriculum construction. It employs Dynamic Responsibility Routing (DRR) to match interventions on evidence, inputs, and actions, selecting learning recipients and building compatible training targets. After generator updates, RSIgen re‑evaluates action utility with fixed branch inputs to refresh agent supervision, then constructs the next curriculum, yielding measurable gains on benchmarks and real‑user evaluations.

By Yidi Liu, Haozhe Wang, Jie Xiao, Kai Zhu, Xueyang Fu, Zheng-Jun Zha