arXiv:2601. 02193v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the extent to which standard machine learning algorithms rely on exchangeability and independence of data by introducing a monotone adversarial corruption model.
By Kasper Green Larsen, Chirag Pabbaraju, Abhishek Shetty
arXiv:2607. 03075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-critical applications require classifiers that are both robust and reliable.
By Nicolas Sournac, Ahmed Baha Ben Jmaa, Bertrand Braeckeveldt
arXiv:2606. 31653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Certified training aims to produce models whose predictions can be formally verified against adversarial perturbations, typically by optimising upper bounds on the worst-case loss over an allowed perturbation set.
By Matteo Melis, Jesus Martinez Del Rincon, Vishal Sharma
arXiv:2510. 09288v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The vulnerability of machine learning models to adversarial attacks remains a critical societal security challenge.
By Pablo G. Arce, Roi Naveiro, David R\'ios Insua
arXiv:2406. 05670v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern machine learning pipelines leverage large amounts of public data, making it infeasible to guarantee data quality and leaving models open to poisoning and backdoor attacks.
By Philip Sosnin, Mark N. M\"uller, Maximilian Baader, Calvin Tsay, Matthew Wicker
arXiv:2606. 01437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations, leading to extensive research on robustness for safety-critical applications.
By Daniel Sadig, Mohammadreza Maleki, Hamed Karimi, Reza Samavi
arXiv:2608. 13514v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We revisit the problem of learning predictors robust to adversarial examples at test-time.
By Omar Montasser
arXiv:2608.21488v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: While machine learning models have demonstrated strong performance in many domains, these models have shown profound vulnerabilities when they are ex...
By Mohammad Meymani, Roozbeh Razavi-Far
The paper introduces a penalized distributionally robust optimization framework that allows an adversary to choose any distribution while incurring a Wasserstein penalty for deviating from the empirical distribution. It shows that the adversary’s problem can be reformulated as optimizing transport maps that push empirical samples to adversarial ones, proving that optimal maps are cyclically monotone. The authors argue that standard per-sample adversarial training violates this property and propose two remedies—multi-start particle ascent and input-convex neural network parameterization—to enforce cyclical monotonicity, demonstrating improved robustness and generalization in experiments on regression, image classification, and control tasks.
By Alireza Abdollahpoorrostam, Ehsan Sharifian, Buse \c{S}en, Marco Cuturi, Daniel Kuhn
arXiv:2607. 05536v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Randomized smoothing has emerged as a scalable technique for certifying the adversarial robustness of classifiers.
By Jie Zhang, Natalie Frank
The paper presents a polynomial‑time algorithm for robustly learning Boolean concept classes with respect to a fixed distribution, achieving the optimal error rate of η + ε where η is the noise rate. It builds on Blanc’s earlier, computationally inefficient algorithm and introduces no‑regret learners to overcome the previous limitations. Additionally, the authors provide an efficient method that does not require an ERM oracle for any function class admitting sandwiching polynomials under hypercontractive distributions, including a first polynomial‑time solution for learning halfspaces with Gaussian marginals at error η + ε.
By Adam R. Klivans, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Sergei Tikhonov, Arsen Vasilyan
We revisit the problem of learning predictors robust to adversarial examples at test-time. We prove that VC classes are adversarially robustly learnable with sample complexity linear in the VC dimension $d$, providing an exponential improvement over the previous upper bound of Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro (2019).