arXiv:2608.24559v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Despite the critical role of grey literature in scholarly communication, artefacts such as Calls for Papers (CfPs) remain largely isolated from moder...
By Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Alexis Vizcaino, Aliaksandr Birukou, Enrico Motta
arXiv:2204. 04883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the advent of the cloud computing era, the cost of creating, capturing, and managing information has gradually decreased.
By Yue Wang, Zhe Xue, Ang Li
arXiv:2609.26218v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Structural graph analysis of the academic publishing network captures the topological relationships between entities but does not see the content of...
By Robert \v{S}am\'arek, Radek Martinek
The paper introduces the Scientific Contribution Graph, a large-scale resource that extracts 6 million scientific contributions from 655 k open-access papers across multiple disciplines and links them with 36 million prerequisite edges. It frames automated technological roadmapping as the task of identifying contributions and their prerequisites, and presents a new scientific prerequisite prediction task where models forecast which existing technologies enable future discoveries. The authors report that current models achieve a 0.48 MAP score on temporally-filtered backtesting, indicating rapid progress in this area.
By Peter A. Jansen
The paper introduces a time‑aligned evolving concept graph framework that jointly models semantic and structural changes in scientific literature. By treating dated papers as shared update events, it reconstructs both semantic and structural states from the same publication history for each prediction time, and fuses these states at the pair level to forecast co‑occurrence, relation formation, and conditional relation type. Experiments on a large graph of 187,848 papers and 270,687 concepts show that refreshing context with graph updates boosts mean relation AUPRC by 16.6% and raises mean relation AUROC from 0.9290 to 0.9722.
By Fred Sun, Jingze Wang, Minkun Xu, Shangqi Guo
arXiv:2204. 08476v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In recent years, with the increase of social investment in scientific research, the number of research results in various fields has increased significantly.
By Changwei Zheng, Zhe Xue, Meiyu Liang, Feifei Kou, Zeli Guan
arXiv:2606. 13669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration.
By Zongsheng Cao, Bihao Zhan, Jinxin Shi, Jiong Wang, Fangchen Yu, Zhijie Zhong, Zijie Guo, Tianshuo Peng, Zhuo Liu, Yi Xie, Xiang Zhuang, Yue Fan, Runmin Ma, Shiyang Feng, Xiangchao Yan, Anran Liu, Peng Ye, Wenlong Zhang, Shufei Zhang, Chunfeng Song, Fenghua Ling, Jie Zhou, Liang He, Bo Zhang, Lei Bai
Forecasting scientific relations can guide discovery by identifying promising connections before they emerge. Existing approaches often model concept semantics and graph structure separately or summar...
arXiv:2204. 04887v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Since the era of big data, the Internet has been flooded with all kinds of information.
By Yang Jiang, Zhe Xue, Ang Li
arXiv:2606. 24099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Algorithms have become central to scientific research in the era of artificial intelligence (AI).
By Yuzhuo Wang, Chengzhi Zhang, Min Song, Seong Deok Kim, Youngsoo Ko, Juhee Lee
arXiv:2608. 07254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing specialization of scientific research challenges existing classification systems, which provide effective representations of broad disciplines and research topics but often fail to capture the fine-grained conceptual structure of contemporary science.
By Daniele Raimondi, Feichi Lu, Oliver Grun, Mariia Eremina, Andrea Perlato
The zbMATH Open Knowledge Graph is a large-scale RDF knowledge graph that spans more than 250 years of mathematical scholarship. It goes beyond traditional bibliographic metadata by incorporating expert-curated semantic content such as reviews, keywords, subject classifications, software references, and disambiguated authorship. With 34 million entities and 168 million RDF triples, the graph enables fine-grained, historically grounded exploration of mathematical concepts, research fields, and scholarly relationships over time.
By Yuni Susanti, Moritz Schubotz