arXiv:2606.22342v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: How does research evolve, and can we trace it at the level of individual claims? Scientific progress is not simply a uniform accumulation of facts....
By Abdul Muntakim, Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan, Sadid Hasan, Yong Pei
How does research evolve, and what substrate would let us forecast where it goes next? Scientific progress is not simply a uniform accumulation of facts: ideas extend prior methods, address known limitations, realize proposed future directions, and sometimes dispute earlier claims.
arXiv:2204. 04883v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the advent of the cloud computing era, the cost of creating, capturing, and managing information has gradually decreased.
By Yue Wang, Zhe Xue, Ang Li
arXiv:2204. 04888v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In recent years, with the continuous progress of science and technology, the number of scientific research achievements has increased rapidly.
By Runyu Yu, Zhe Xue, Ang Li
arXiv:2510. 16152v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scientific literature is increasingly fragmented by disciplinary boundaries, specialized terminology, and potentially sparse keyword systems, making it difficult to capture the evolving structure of modern science.
By Mason Smetana, Lev Khazanovich
arXiv:2204. 06221v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the era of big data, intellectual property-oriented scientific and technological resources show the trend of large data scale, high information density, and low value density, which brings severe challenges to the effective use of intellectual property resources, and the demand for mining hidden information in intellectual property is increasing.
By Yuhui Wang, Yingxia Shao, Ang Li
arXiv:2204. 09333v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In recent years, with the rapid growth of Internet data, the number and types of scientific and technological resources are also rapidly expanding.
By Bowen Yu, Yingxia Shao, Ang Li
The paper introduces the Scientific Contribution Graph, a large-scale resource that extracts 6 million scientific contributions from 655 k open-access papers across multiple disciplines and links them with 36 million prerequisite edges. It frames automated technological roadmapping as the task of identifying contributions and their prerequisites, and presents a new scientific prerequisite prediction task where models forecast which existing technologies enable future discoveries. The authors report that current models achieve a 0.48 MAP score on temporally-filtered backtesting, indicating rapid progress in this area.
By Peter A. Jansen
arXiv:2609.35845v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Macroeconomic productivity metrics, such as Total Factor Productivity, register technological breakthroughs with multi-year reporting lags due to adm...
By Muhammad Sukri Bin Ramli
arXiv:2509. 02581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions.
By Azanzi Jiomekong, Hande K\"u\c{c}\"uk McGinty, Keith G. Mills, Allard Oelen, Enayat Rajabi, Harry McElroy, Antrea Christou, Anmol Saini, Janice Anta Zebaze, Hannah Kim, Anna M. Jacyszyn, Gollam Rabby, Dirk Betz, Claudia Biniossek, Sanju Tiwari, S\"oren Auer
The paper proposes a new method for measuring the novelty of biomedical research by calculating latent distances between knowledge units—specifically MeSH terms—using three types of relationships: network, semantic, and hierarchical. It demonstrates that each relationship captures distinct distances and that combining all three yields a more accurate novelty assessment than existing metrics. Validation on a large PLoS ONE dataset and a H1 Connect dataset shows stronger alignment with peer judgments compared to prior indicators.
By Yi Zhao, Heng Zhang, Yuzhuo Wang, Wenqing Wu, Tong Bao, Chengzhi Zhang
arXiv:2609.14770v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Generalisations are common in scientific communication, even though they are semantically ambiguous. An automated method is needed to identify and ca...
By Chenxin Diao, Nataliya Stepanova, Emily Allaway