Gibbs‑Gap Policy Optimization (GGPO) is a new off‑policy reinforcement learning method that avoids high‑variance learner‑to‑behavior importance weights by minimizing a log‑mean‑exp contrast of KL‑adjusted rewards across responses to the same prompt. Derived from KL‑regularized policy optimization, GGPO guarantees that a learner’s single‑response expected reward is at least the behavior policy’s best‑of‑K reward minus bounded terms, and it includes a reference‑refresh mechanism that empirically improves performance. Experiments on benchmark problems and mathematical reasoning tasks show GGPO outperforming GRPO and AGRO, especially under training‑inference mismatch and with fixed offline data.
whyItMatters":"The paper demonstrates a practical improvement in off‑policy RL for language models by reducing variance and ensuring better reward guarantees, which is directly supported by the reported empirical gains and theoretical bounds."
By Xuanchang Zhang, Tong Zhang
The paper introduces Cross-Behavior Policy Optimization (CBPO), a method that unifies offline demonstrations and policy-generated rollouts into a single regression loss using a fixed-reference target. CBPO eliminates the need for separate supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning objectives, allowing positive and negative offline completions, reference responses, and current and historical rollouts to share a common reward‑labeled format and replay buffer. Experiments on two model scales and four mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CBPO, especially the CBPO‑Unified variant, outperforms baseline methods in avg@32 and pass@32 metrics, with historical rollouts providing additional gains.
By Du Cheng, Junyu Lu, Jingfan Zhang, Yuzhuo Zhang, Haoxuan Jia, Shichao Weng
arXiv:2609.36178v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a promising approach for training large language model agents. However, its uniform assignment o...
By Dongwon Jung, Hemanth Neelgund Ramesh, Yifan Wang, Xiaomin Li, Yuexing Hao, Yu Hu, Muhao Chen, Varun Chandrasekaran, Andrzej Banburski-Fahey, Jaron Lanier
arXiv:2610.08963v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents trains one policy on trajectories generated by another: rollouts come fr...
By Yifan Zhang
MInTRL (Minimal Intervention Reinforcement Learning) expands exploration in on-policy reinforcement learning by inserting sparse, local corrections into rollouts via a judge-intervention policy. These interventions replace erroneous suffixes and immediately return control to the main policy, allowing the agent to explore beyond its natural trajectory while maintaining on-policy data. The method uses a sequence-level advantage-regression objective, avoiding importance sampling, and demonstrates superior performance on math and code benchmarks compared to standard on-policy and off-policy baselines.
By Mingyu Chen, Yefan Tao, Gerald Friedland, Xuezhou Zhang, Chris Kong
arXiv:2609.36587v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a prominent approach for improving language-model performance on reasoning tasks using...
By Yupeng Chang, Wenxuan Zhang, Yuan Wu
arXiv:2608.20909v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Offline RL methods commonly jointly train the actor and critic, where the critic is used to guide the actor toward higher-value actions. This coupled l...
By Xuyao Lin, Yixiang Shan, Jinru Duan, Tao Yang, Xinyu Zhao, Runyu Lei, Yiming Zhao, Jiaxin Fan, Zongbao Feng, Peng Jia
arXiv:2610.20497v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) trains language models from checked task outcomes, but assigning a terminal reward to individual...
By Wei Chen, Yubing Wu, Zhou Xu, Haoyue Zhang, Delu Zeng, Jiahao Wang, Junmei Yang, Pan tiewen, Jingfeng Liu, Zhiheng Zhou, Bo Li, Min Chen
Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization (CBPO) is a reinforcement learning method that separates the allocation of a fixed rollout budget from the translation of branch outcomes into token-level credit. It uses generation entropy to screen branch positions, path- and node-level decay to distribute the budget, and Contrastive Branch Value (CBV) to estimate local decision sensitivity without changing reward signs. CBPO partitions trajectories into non-overlapping credit segments, preventing duplicated gradients and enabling fine-grained credit assignment using only outcome rewards.
By Ying Wang, Changlin Qiu, Bang Lin, Linbo Jin, Wen Jiang, Zhe Sun, Jingli Yang
arXiv:2608. 07719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning repeatedly trains policies from a fixed transition pool, making redundant data costly across seeds and hyperparameters, while naive subsampling can remove rare transitions needed for long-horizon credit assignment.
By Ibne Farabi Shihab, Sanjeda Akter, Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan, Md Najmus Swaqeeb, Anuj Sharma
SCARL (Sequence Confidence-Aligned Reinforcement Learning) addresses a misalignment between a reinforcement learning policy’s confidence and its reward signal in language-model reasoning. By reshaping each advantage with an alignment gap that reflects the difference between a response’s group-relative confidence and the outcome it certifies, SCARL drives responses with equal advantage toward equal confidence and mitigates entropy collapse. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B‑Base show a 2.4‑point lift in Pass@32 over DAPO and consistent improvements across multiple estimators and backbones while preserving policy entropy.
By Zhenghong Ke, Jingbo Zhou, Hua Wu
arXiv:2605.28295v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) trains reasoning models without labeled trajectories, using groups of verifier-scored rollout...
By Soeun Kim, Albert No