arXiv AI

From Wearable Data to Personalized and Actionable Health Insights

arXiv:2608. 03251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Commercial wearable devices continuously capture rich physiological data (e.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data

WearableQA is a new benchmark that tests AI systems on health reasoning using real-world wearable data from 200 users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. It contains 4,084 ten‑option multiple‑choice questions derived from wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics, and is organized into 16 question types that distinguish data‑driven computation from physiological interpretation and single‑signal from cross‑signal reasoning. Evaluation of 14 large language models shows wide performance gaps, indicating that the benchmark remains challenging and useful for diagnosing model capabilities.

By Ji Soo Lee, Xilun Chen, Pierce Chuang, Ashish Shenoy, Jason Wei, Dohwan Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Benoit Corda
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Towards a General Intelligence and Interface for Wearable Health Data

arXiv:2605. 22759v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While ubiquitous wearable sensors capture a wealth of behavioral and physiological information, effectively transforming these signals into personalized health insights is challenging.

By Girish Narayanswamy, Maxwell A. Xu, A. Ali Heydari, Samy Abdel-Ghaffar, Marius Guerard, Kara Vaillancourt, Zhihan Zhang, Jake Garrison, Levi Albuquerque, Dimitris Spathis, Hong Yu, Hamid Palangi, Xuhai "Orson" Xu, David G. T. Barrett, Joseph Breda, Jed McGiffin, Yubin Kim, Yuwei Zhang, Naghmeh Rezaei, Samuel Solomon, Karan Ahuja, Tim Althoff, Jake Sunshine, Ming-Zher Poh, Benjamin Yetton, Ari Winbush, Nicholas B. Allen, James M. Rehg, Isaac Galatzer-Levy, Yun Liu, John Hernandez, Anupam Pathak, Conor Heneghan, Yuzhe Yang, Ahmed A. Metwally, Pushmeet Kohli, Mark Malhotra, Shwetak Patel, Xin Liu, Daniel McDuff
arXiv AI
Jul 21

OpenMHC: Accelerating the Science of Wearable Foundation Models

arXiv:2607. 16235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mobile and wearable devices offer an unprecedented opportunity for continuous, passive health monitoring and active health coaching.

By Narayan Schuetz, Yuze Bai, Lianggang Pan, Edgar Eggert, Favour Nerrise, Juan Delgado-SanMartin, Max Rosenblattl, Milana Gurbanova, Mohammad Asadi, Anders Johnson, Paul Schmiedmayer, Dennis Wang, Allan Lawrie, Daniel Seung Kim, Xin Liu, Akshay Paruchuri, Ehsan Adeli, Euan Ashley, Kelly W. Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 19

VitalAgent: A Tool-Augmented Agent for Reactive and Proactive Physiological Monitoring over Wearable Health Data

arXiv:2605. 29483v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wearable devices enable continuous monitoring of physiological signals such as ECG and PPG, but existing mHealth systems are largely limited to task-specific prediction pipelines or reactive question answering over static summaries.

By Di Zhu, Yu Yvonne Wu, Hong Jia, Aaqib Saeed, Vassilis Kostakos, Ting Dang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

Affective Agent: On-Device Personalized Intervention Reasoning for Wearable Systems

The paper introduces Affective Agent, a three‑layer reference architecture designed for on‑device personalized intervention reasoning in wearable systems. It integrates a compact sub‑billion‑parameter language model with physiological data, context, and user history to determine when and how to intervene, all without cloud support or per‑user retraining. The architecture’s perception, personalization, and reasoning layers adapt through host‑managed structured memory evolution, and evaluation on simulated indoor environmental quality scenarios shows that memory‑driven personalization and two‑pass reasoning enhance intervention decisions.

By Reina Mun, Zishen Wan, Vijay Janapa Reddi
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

BALMS: Benchmarking Agentic LLMs for Longitudinal Mental Health Sensing

BALMS is a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) agents that analyze longitudinal wearable data to predict mental‑health wellbeing scores and generate evidence‑grounded rationales. It covers three real‑world datasets, two task families (score prediction and rationale generation), and tests five LLM backbones across open‑ and closed‑source paradigms. The study finds that zero‑shot agents rarely beat a simple mean baseline, and while chain‑of‑thought prompting helps reasoning, it does not ensure temporal grounding or numerical accuracy.

By Yu Yvonne Wu, Arvind Pillai, Yuliang Chen, Yuwei Zhang, Sudarshan Regmi, Tess Z. Griffin, Michael V. Heinz, Lisa A. Marsch, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Andrew Campbell