The study evaluates how extractive prompt compressors affect token costs across ten languages, finding that compressors trained on English data widen the token premium gap for non‑English languages, while a multilingual compressor does not. The gap is tied to the supervision data rather than model architecture, and aggressive compression can reduce non‑English contexts to near‑zero utility. A translate‑then‑compress approach can match or outperform native compression at roughly half the token cost in several languages.
arXiv:2609.13154v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have made prompts increasingly large and complex. Techniques such as chain-of-thought reasoning (Wei et...
arXiv:2609.39001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM services are billed per token and context windows are measured in tokens, yet the number of tokens needed for the same content varies across lang...
arXiv:2609.27510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and...
arXiv:2609.35869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-tokenisation restricts which text fragments can become prediction units, but its compression cost is obscured when tokenisers are compared only und...
The paper introduces two new tokenisation algorithms—BottomUpLL and TopDownComp—to systematically explore the 2x2 design space defined by optimisation objective (compression vs. log‑likelihood) and search procedure (bottom‑up merging vs. top‑down pruning). Experiments across model sizes, vocabularies, and domains show that the search procedure, rather than the objective, consistently yields lower bits‑per‑byte, while no clear pattern emerges on the BLiMP benchmark. These findings clarify how tokeniser design choices influence language‑model performance and provide guidance for constructing tokenisers more principledly.
Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and undermining the reliability of evaluation results....
arXiv:2606. 31796v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study three complementary techniques for training compute-efficient language models.
arXiv:2508.11857v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tokenization remains a persistent bottleneck in language modeling, especially when vocabulary learning is limited by whitespace boundaries. W...
arXiv:2607. 15232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A tokenizer fixed at the start of pre-training allocates vocabulary in proportion to the pre-training corpus, reflecting the deployment priorities at that time.
arXiv:2608.21384v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern multilingual tokenizers often fragment Ukrainian and other underrepresented Cyrillic-script languages more heavily than English, creating disp...
Manacá-1B is a 1.72‑billion‑parameter, open decoder‑only language model trained from scratch for Brazilian Portuguese, released with a fully containerized, reproducible training pipeline and complete logs. The authors evaluate it against nine open baselines on four Portuguese benchmarks, reporting standard errors and paired significance tests, and find that Manacá-1B outperforms smaller models on LAMBADA‑PT while remaining competitive on commonsense completion. They also uncover a tokenizer‑related evaluation pitfall that can drastically lower accuracy and provide a simple fix, releasing all code, logs, and corrected tokenizer for full reproducibility.
arXiv:2610.10304v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study whether latent sequence compression of prompt prefixes preserves the capabilities that large language models rely on during inference. We intr...