arXiv:2511. 13749v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, which are small, carefully crafted inputs that lead to incorrect predictions.
By Ci Lin, Tet Yeap, Iluju Kiringa
arXiv:2610.34934v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Machine learning systems trained on untrusted data are vulnerable to data and backdoor poisoning attacks, in which an adversary corrupts training and t...
By Evan Rose, Alina Oprea
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on vision-language tasks, but incorporating visual inputs through a vision encoder (e. g.
FSPGD introduces a feature-space black-box attack for semantic segmentation that targets intermediate representations rather than just output logits. The method uses a dual loss: an external loss to disrupt cross-model feature alignment and an internal loss to reduce consistency among same-class instances. Experiments on Pascal VOC 2012 and Cityscapes show that FSPGD outperforms existing logit-level and segmentation-specific attacks across CNN and Transformer backbones, and its adversarial examples improve robustness when used for training.
By Eun-Sol Park, MiSo Park, Yong-Goo Shin
Vision foundation models such as DINOv2 enable strong few‑shot anomaly detection (FSAD) using a frozen backbone and a non‑parametric k‑nearest‑neighbor (k‑NN) scorer. The paper introduces a white‑box attack framework for k‑NN memory‑bank detectors and proposes an adversarially robust FSAD method that is training‑free with respect to the backbone. The defense combines a PatchShift input augmentation and a FeaturePurifier residual MLP, achieving significant gains in image‑level AUROC (~27%) and pixel‑level PRO (~51%) on MVTec‑AD, VisA, and MPDD while maintaining clean accuracy within 3%.
whyItMatters:"The work addresses the previously unstudied few‑shot regime for robust anomaly detection, providing a practical, training‑free defense that matches full‑shot adversarially‑trained baselines and improves performance under adversarial attacks."
By Akib Mohammed Khan, Bartosz Krawczyk
arXiv:2606. 01746v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern neural networks are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations.
By Kai Wang
arXiv:2412. 08394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial samples crafted by adding imperceptible perturbations to clean data, potentially leading to incorrect and dangerous predictions.
By Shuhai Zhang, Jiahao Yang, Hui Luo, Jie Chen, Li Wang, Feng Liu, Bo Han, Mingkui Tan
While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), represented by LLaVA and GPT-4V, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, their visual inputs remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, posing significant security risks. Existing defense methods predominantly target single-task scenarios (e.
arXiv:2607. 18958v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), represented by LLaVA and GPT-4V, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, their visual inputs remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, posing significant security risks.
By Sibo Wang, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen, Wen Gao
arXiv:2606. 02267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial examples poses a significant challenge for real-world deployment.
By Nicolas Stalder, Benjamin F. Grewe, Matteo Saponati, Pau Vilimelis Aceituno
arXiv:2601. 12359v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompt injection attacks have become an increasing vulnerability for LLM applications, where adversarial prompts exploit indirect input channels such as emails or user-generated content to circumvent alignment safeguards and induce harmful or unintended outputs.
By Anirudh Sekar, Mrinal Agarwal, Rachel Sharma, Akitsugu Tanaka, Jasmine Zhang, Arjun Damerla, Kevin Zhu
The paper introduces MOSAIC, a large adversarial benchmark for detecting AI-generated text, and presents NeuroStat, a new framework that combines token‑level probabilistic logits with deep semantic hidden states from a single language model. NeuroStat fuses these signals via Macro‑State Residual Modulation and uses orthogonal and contrastive losses to learn complementary representations. Experiments show that NeuroStat outperforms existing methods on MOSAIC, achieving superior robustness against adversarial attacks.
By Peiming Li, Yifan Wang, Zhiyuan Hu, Shiyu Li, Zheng Wei, Yang Tang