The paper introduces a new metric, Relative Peak Prominence Rate (RelPPR), to detect black-box LLM-generated text by measuring localized entropy fluctuations. It shows that existing dual-model and resampling-based detectors fail on instruction-conditioned text, and that RelPPR outperforms them across diverse models and datasets. The authors provide code for their detector on GitHub.
arXiv:2607. 04061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge.
The paper investigates training‑free detection of machine‑generated text using spectral analysis. It shows that spectral energy correlates with variance in token probability trajectories and that human writing produces characteristic fluctuations, termed "generative vitality." The authors find that spectral signals are strongest for long, continuous, constrained generations, while shorter or mixed texts require additional confidence‑based metrics.
The study evaluates machine‑generated text detectors on scientific literature, finding that many detectors perform near perfectly on certain benchmarks due to superficial formatting cues rather than genuine linguistic differences. A logistic regression using 27 superficial features achieved macro‑F1 scores between 0.833 and 0.997, outperforming other detectors on arXiv subsets. The most powerful cue was the PDF extraction artifact—human texts preserve line breaks while generated texts appear as a single block—allowing classification at 0.996 AUC. By introducing format counterfactuals and normalizing formatting, the authors demonstrate that re‑wrapping machine‑written abstracts can flip 20–27% of detector decisions, reducing the generalization gap and improving out‑of‑domain performance.
arXiv:2610.09976v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-generated text (AIGT) detection can be sensitive to the decoding choices of the source large language model (LLM). We observe that perturbing next-t...
Distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written text (HWT) becomes increasingly important due to potential misuse. However, most supervised detectors often degrade out-of-domain (OOD) a...
arXiv:2509.26189v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models has intensified the challenge of distinguishing LLM-generated text from human writing in non-Engli...
arXiv:2604. 25860v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine-generated text (MGT) detection requires identifying structurally invariant signals across generation models, rather than relying on model-specific fingerprints.
arXiv:2608. 05741v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent and convincing text at scale, creating growing risks for misinformation dissemination, educational misuse, and platform governance.
Cross-Layer Attention Probing (CLAP) is a new activation‑probing method that examines the entire residual stream of Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect hallucinations. Experiments on five LLMs across three tasks demonstrate that CLAP outperforms baseline detectors for both greedy and temperature‑sampled outputs, enabling fine‑grained discrimination between hallucinated and non‑hallucinated responses. The approach also supports a detect‑then‑mitigate strategy that reduces hallucinations and maintains reliability even on out‑of‑distribution data.
arXiv:2608.29903v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made AI-generated text detection increasingly critical. Existing zero-shot detectors assume...
arXiv:2605.12890v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made machine-generated text increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-writte...
The paper investigates how to detect text generated by large language models (LLMs) when the data has been edited or contaminated. By modeling human and machine text as finite-order Markov processes with Huber contamination, the authors derive an exact boundary that determines when reliable detection is possible. They show that a clipped likelihood-ratio test can achieve vanishing worst‑case errors below this boundary and that clipping improves robustness across several detectors and datasets, yielding significant gains in true‑positive rates at a fixed false‑positive rate.