arXiv:2607. 00684v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The classification accuracy of pretrained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) relies on the quality of the text prompts.
By Seokhee Jin, Changhwan Sung, Sunung Mun, Hoyoung Kim, Jungseul Ok
The paper "Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education" argues that existing LLM‑generated text detectors assume a binary human/LLM distinction, which fails to capture realistic student‑AI collaboration. It introduces a contribution‑aware evaluation framework with eight student contribution levels and presents GEDE, a benchmark of over 900 human‑written and 12,500 generated essays across 886 tasks. Using GEDE, the authors evaluate four detection methods and find that most detectors perform poorly on intermediate contribution levels, especially LLM‑assisted revisions, raising concerns about false accusations.
By Lukas Gehring, Benjamin Paa{\ss}en
arXiv:2605.12890v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has made machine-generated text increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-writte...
By Luxu Liang, Xiang Li
arXiv:2607. 04061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge.
By Christopher Nassif, Josh F. Cooper
arXiv:2607. 29378v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generate text by auto-regressively sampling the next token.
By Pirzada Suhail, Nagasai Saketh Naidu, Atanu R Sinha, Amit Sethi
arXiv:2512. 08724v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Text-to-image (TTI) diffusion models have achieved remarkable visual quality, yet they have been repeatedly shown to exhibit social biases across sensitive attributes such as gender, race and age.
By Manos Plitsis, Giorgos Bouritsas, Vassilis Katsouros, Yannis Panagakis