EmbodiedSkills is a unified framework that treats each skill decision as an execution proposal, checking prerequisites and verifying outcomes during long‑horizon vision‑language‑action tasks. It connects high‑level skill selection, bounded low‑level VLA execution, and post‑action verification through a fixed executable‑skill interface, enabling easy replacement of low‑level policies and recording of structured trajectories for supervision and adaptation. Instantiated with Qwen3‑VL and OpenPI/pi0.5 on RoboTwin 2.0 and LIBERO, the framework achieves high success rates (86.20% and 97.40% respectively) and demonstrates effective memory‑dependent task performance.
By Wei Wang, Wenqiao Zhang, Yutong Lin, Yuqian Yuan, Tianwei Lin, Jinhao Mao, Zhenxuan Fan, Mingjian Gao, Yang Dai, Wentong Li, Zheqi Lv, Zheng Dong, Yingjie Niu, Jiaqi Zhu, Jun Xiao, Chao Li, Yueting Zhuang
arXiv:2607. 11119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robot manipulation is a complex task that requires visual understanding, physical reasoning, planning, and closed-loop control.
By Hengyuan Hu, Priya Sundaresan, Jensen Gao, Dorsa Sadigh
FluxVLA Engine is an open, configuration‑driven platform that unifies the fragmented components of embodied policy development—datasets, visual‑language and world models, action heads, learning methods, distributed training, simulation evaluation, inference, and robot interfaces—into a reproducible data‑to‑deployment workflow. It adds features such as compositional dual‑arm simulation, scalable automatic data generation, human‑in‑the‑loop rollout and correction, Real‑Time Chunking for fast inference, and lightweight remote GPU serving, thereby linking offline learning, simulation validation, online correction, and real‑robot execution under shared, auditable contracts. The engine aims to eliminate engineering bottlenecks that currently separate promising embodied‑learning algorithms from reliable, reproducible deployment.
By Yinhao Li, Weixin Mao, Zihan Lan, Jikun Rong, Qirui Hu, Yiming Zhang, Weipeng Deng, Bowen Shen, Minzhao Zhu, Yiming Mao, Yan Yang, Chenguang Cui, Hongyuan Chen, Xu Huang, Zheyi Zhao, Pinxi Shen, Bozhen He, Zhen Fu, Yifan Wang, Zexin Zhang, Ang Gao, Haoyu Chen, Chengqi Shi, Hua Chen
arXiv:2603. 24576v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robots often observe information that determines a future action long before that action is executed.
By Xinying Guo, Chenxi Jiang, Hyun Bin Kim, Yuhang Han, Ying Sun, Yang Xiao, Jianfei Yang
arXiv:2609.40306v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Pretrained robot policies provide useful action priors, but long-horizon manipulation still requires coordination between semantic reasoning and phys...
By Haoyuan Deng, Jiebin Liu, Tengxiao Zhang, Langning Yan, Hongye Cao, Ziwei Wang
arXiv:2606. 19980v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Achieving dexterous robotic manipulation in the real world heavily relies on human supervision and algorithm engineering, which becomes a central bottleneck in the pursuit of general physical intelligence.
By Wenli Xiao, Jia Xie, Tonghe Zhang, Haotian Lin, Letian "Max" Fu, Haoru Xue, Jalen Lu, Yi Yang, Cunxi Dai, Zi Wang, Jimmy Wu, Guanzhi Wang, S. Shankar Sastry, Ken Goldberg, Linxi "Jim" Fan, Yuke Zhu, Guanya Shi
The paper surveys 160 benchmarks from 2017‑2026 that evaluate predictive embodied intelligence, categorising them into policy suites, embodied agents, world‑model evaluation, and prediction‑to‑action bridges. It finds that most benchmarks are model‑agnostic, rarely compare Vision‑Language‑Action policies to world models, and seldom turn predictions into executed actions. The authors argue that the lack of benchmarks designed to directly test the closed‑loop advantage of world models prevents the field from answering whether such models truly improve robotic performance.
By Gaytri Jena, Kapil Wanaskar, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Vasu Sharma, Amitava Das
arXiv:2610.01939v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision language model (VLM) agents can control robots through visual feedback and action primitives, but repeated model invocations and redundant obser...
By Ruiyang Si, Jianxin Bi, Shunyu Yang, Rui Ni, Wenbo Huang, Qiang Wang, Shulong Jiang, Duomin Wang, Xiuyu Li, Haiwen Feng, Zhen Dong, Daquan Zhou
HarnessPAI is a model‑ and embodiment‑agnostic framework that treats code as an executable, evolvable interface for Physical AI. It separates short‑term open‑loop program execution from long‑term closed‑loop evolution, using feedback to refine programs and distill reusable skills. Across various robots, HarnessPAI outperforms pure action models and code‑as‑policy baselines, achieving significant gains on tasks like LIBERO‑PRO and RoboCasa without retraining the underlying model.
By Xin Wang, Wenhao Wu, Menghao Zhang, Zhi Wang, Kun Shao, Jian Luan, Yang Li, Qing Li, Shangding Gu, Huichi Zhou, Shuqing Shi, Fei Ni, Shuo Lu, Weicheng Meng, Kang Li, Jin Wu, Kang Zhao, Shangmin Guo, Gen Li, Yongqiang Tang, Zhizhong Zhang, Yuan Xie, Heng Qu
HarnessPAI introduces a model‑ and embodiment‑agnostic harness framework for Physical AI that treats code as an executable, evolvable interface organizing action primitives. The framework operates on two timescales: within a rollout it executes an open‑loop program, and across rollouts it evolves a closed‑loop program using feedback to refine the program and distill reusable skills. Across diverse robotic platforms, HarnessPAI outperforms pure action models and code‑as‑policy baselines, achieving significant gains on tasks such as LIBERO‑PRO and RoboCasa, and enabling efficient expert‑data collection for further fine‑tuning.
arXiv:2606. 17511v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Robot learning and embodied agents now require simulation to serve as a shared execution substrate linking control, skills, and planning, not only as a renderer, controller testbed, or fixed task environment.
By Haoran Lu, Songling Liu, Yue Chen, Guo Ye, Mutian Shen, Shuyang Yu, Yu Xiao, Jihai Zhao, Shang Wu, Jianshu Zhang, Xiangtian Gui, Chuye Hong, Yuran Wang, Maojiang Su, Jiayi Wang, Ruihai Wu, Zhaoran Wang, Han Liu
The paper introduces URAI, a Universal Robot‑Agent Interface that separates robot control into two roles: a programming agent that writes reusable, task‑specific tools from intent, and an execution agent that calls these tools in a feedback loop. This design keeps high‑level decision making in the model while delegating low‑level motion to code, allowing tool revisions to persist across episodes without retraining the foundation model. Experiments on RoboDojo and AgileX tasks show significant gains in success rate, speed, and token efficiency compared to direct fingertip control and pre‑written programs.
By Shijia Ge, Alex Zhou, Jianshu Zeng, Yexing Wan, Di Wu, Zelin Zheng, Yazhe Wang, Zhiqi Jia, Xuan Shangguan, Jay Zhu, Yijun Liu, Lingyu He, Sihang Wu, Xiao He, Hongcheng Gao