The paper critiques the common reinforcement‑learning approach of sampling tool subsets when the full set of tools is enumerable, showing that sampling leads to degraded policy estimates and increased reward sparsity in genomic reasoning tasks. It proposes Full‑Group Policy Optimization (FGPO), which evaluates every tool subset and precomputes rewards in a table, thereby eliminating the need for frozen‑reasoner calls during training. Experiments across five frozen reasoners and three genomic benchmarks demonstrate that FGPO consistently outperforms GRPO, improving average scores by 6.75 points and reducing the number of invoked tools per question.
By Haoyue Liu, Xiaoyu Ma, Ye Chen, Zhichao Wang, Xiaoying Tang
arXiv:2610.09804v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement learning is now central to eliciting reasoning in large language models, while in the popular algorithm Group Relative Policy Optimizatio...
By Yingxiang Yang, Weihang Xiao, Zhunxuan Wang, Joshua Flashner, Niresh Agarwal
arXiv:2607. 00531v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific reasoning is an increasingly important capability of large language models, yet improving the robustness and efficiency of training such reasoning remains a key open challenge.
By Xuefeng Liu, Mingxuan Cao, Qinan Huang, Thomas Brettin, Rick Stevens, Le Cong
arXiv:2607. 00152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Three of the most popular methods for training language models to reason look like three different tricks.
By Yong Yi Bay, Kathleen A. Yearick
arXiv:2607. 26253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is bottlenecked by rollout generation, yet many sampled prompts produce saturated groups (all responses correct or all incorrect) whose zero reward variance yields no policy-gradient signal.
By Pixel Nomand, Elena Voss, Marcus Hale, Sofia Reyes
The paper investigates Evolution Strategies (ES) as a memory‑efficient post‑training method for large language model (LLM) reasoning. It demonstrates that ES outperforms Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) by achieving broader reasoning coverage, improving Pass@K metrics, and avoiding entropy collapse. The study also reveals that ES’s performance gains stem from sparse, high‑magnitude parameter updates, do not cause catastrophic forgetting, and can be combined with GRPO in a sequential training strategy.
By Yunpeng Ba, Zhi Zheng, Yue Xie, Jiaqing Li, Xialiang Tong, Tao Zhong, Mingxuan Yuan, Zhichao Lu, Xuyang Wu, Zhenkun Wang
ReAPO: Retry-Aware Policy Optimization for Efficient Exploration in LLM Reasoning proposes a new approach to improve language‑model reasoning by addressing the inefficiencies of independent stochastic rollouts. By framing credit assignment as a Stochastic Shortest Path problem, ReAPO modifies GRPO to allocate more generation to failed trajectories, reinforcing successful retries without rewarding failures. Experiments on Qwen3 and OLMo‑2 models across eight mathematical and scientific benchmarks show that ReAPO outperforms GRPO and other baselines, achieving higher first‑attempt accuracy and reducing generated tokens needed to reach peak performance.
By Nghi Dao, Calder Morton-Ferguson, Noah Golowich, Adam Block
The paper introduces CLOSEDLOOPGAUSSIAN, an adaptive curriculum strategy for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) that dynamically adjusts the pace and spread of an Easy-to-Hard Gaussian sampler based on probe estimates of per-difficulty accuracy. Unlike fixed easy-to-hard schedules, the method accelerates training when the model outpaces a reference curriculum, slows it down when it lags, and broadens sampling when earlier difficulties regress, thereby keeping training focused on learnable yet challenging tasks. Experiments on symbolic arithmetic reasoning demonstrate that CLOSEDLOOPGAUSSIAN outperforms vanilla GRPO and fixed open-loop curricula, especially in intermediate-difficulty regimes where group-relative learning signals are most informative.
By Yuv Raj Pant, Moshiur Rahman Tonmoy, Kaiqun Fu
arXiv:2610.15888v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards spends much of its rollout budget on states that yield no learning signal. We recast this as a questio...
By Yibo Wang, Yuanxin Liu, Zhaoran Wang
The paper introduces Single‑Rollout Pass@k Policy Optimization (SR‑PPO), a reinforcement learning method that uses only one rollout per prompt to train language‑model agents. SR‑PPO combines Monte Carlo token‑level advantage estimation with Pass@k gradient reweighting and an online critic for baseline and weight estimation. Experiments show that SR‑PPO achieves stable learning and performance comparable to traditional Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on reasoning and logic benchmarks, even when off‑policy drift degrades standard Pass@1 PPO.
By Fengdi Che, Yang Liu, Lei Yu, Meng Cao, Tong Che, Rupam Mahmood, Dale Schuurmans
arXiv:2606. 29082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Would experience designing faster GPU kernels also help close in on a long-standing open mathematical conjecture?
By Young-Jun Lee, Seungone Kim, Minki Kang, Alistair Cheong Liang Chuen, Zerui Chen, Seungho Han, Taehee Jung, Dongyeop Kang
Gibbs‑Gap Policy Optimization (GGPO) is a new off‑policy reinforcement learning method that avoids high‑variance learner‑to‑behavior importance weights by minimizing a log‑mean‑exp contrast of KL‑adjusted rewards across responses to the same prompt. Derived from KL‑regularized policy optimization, GGPO guarantees that a learner’s single‑response expected reward is at least the behavior policy’s best‑of‑K reward minus bounded terms, and it includes a reference‑refresh mechanism that empirically improves performance. Experiments on benchmark problems and mathematical reasoning tasks show GGPO outperforming GRPO and AGRO, especially under training‑inference mismatch and with fixed offline data.
whyItMatters":"The paper demonstrates a practical improvement in off‑policy RL for language models by reducing variance and ensuring better reward guarantees, which is directly supported by the reported empirical gains and theoretical bounds."
By Xuanchang Zhang, Tong Zhang