arXiv:2607. 00224v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking promises a statistical trace of large language model (LLM) use, but real documents, after editing or paraphrasing, rarely arrive as purely human-written or purely machine-generated.
By Shuwen Chai, Qiaosen Wang
arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.
By Chih-Duo Hong, Yen-Pang Chen, Fang Yu
arXiv:2608. 14906v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Watermarking provides a principled way to authenticate text generated by large language models (LLMs).
By Jose H. Blanchet, T. Tony Cai, Xiang Li, Hao Liu, Qi Long, Weijie J. Su
arXiv:2504. 05871v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing deployment of intelligent agents in digital ecosystems, such as social media platforms, has raised significant concerns about traceability and accountability, particularly in cybersecurity and digital content protection.
By Kaibo Huang, Zipei Zhang, Zhongliang Yang, Linna Zhou
arXiv:2509. 21160v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the growing use of large language models, concerns over content authenticity have spurred a variety of watermarking schemes.
By Soham Bonnerjee, Subhrajyoty Roy, Sayar Karmakar
arXiv:2602. 09611v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Watermarking has emerged as a pivotal solution for content traceability and intellectual property protection in large vision language models (LVLMs).
By Yue Li, Xin Yi, Dongsheng Shi, Yongyi Cui, Gerard de Melo, Linlin Wang
arXiv:2607. 18445v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Regulatory regimes such as the EU AI Act mandate machine-readable marking of synthetic text, but existing watermark detectors rely on the generating LM and on heuristic thresholds with no closed-form calibration.
By Chengheng Li-Chen, Kyuhee Kim
arXiv:2603. 23171v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Providers monitor deployed large language models (LLMs) to detect misuse that they cannot prevent.
By Toluwani Aremu, Daniil Ognev, Samuele Poppi, Nils Lukas
arXiv:2601. 11629v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We demonstrate that while the current approaches for language model watermarking are effective for open-ended generation, they are inadequate at watermarking LM outputs for constrained generation tasks with low-entropy output spaces.
By Nghia T. Le, Alan Ritter, Kartik Goyal
arXiv:2607. 13099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success but raise growing concerns about content provenance and misuse, motivating the need for reliable watermarking techniques.
By Z Sun, Q Jiang, S Sheng, L Xiang
arXiv:2608. 03174v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI systems increasingly produce content whose provenance is difficult to verify, motivating watermarking techniques for identifying model-generated outputs.
By Miryam Mi-Ying Huang, Chung-Wei Lee, Max Raffel, Er-Cheng Tang
arXiv:2607. 10554v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the development of generative AI, watermarking techniques have been widely used to detect the authenticity of AI-generated data and protect the rights of users and creators.
By Dongyu Cui, Xuan Bi