The study investigates how long‑video language models decide which frames to keep, compress, and reuse, testing each decision in isolation across six selection rules, three benchmarks, and two answering models. It finds that selecting frames based on queries yields the biggest performance boost, that halving spatial resolution costs little, and that reallocating saved tokens to more compressed frames can further improve accuracy. The work also highlights the importance of a unified evaluation harness to avoid misleading comparisons.
By Prakhar Khatri
arXiv:2610.14028v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data selection for LLM fine-tuning faces two facts about real training: data pools draw from many distinct domains, and evaluation spans diverse task...
By Luyang Zhang, Jialu Wang, Bebei Li
arXiv:2606. 03938v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-epoch training is becoming the standard now that compute is growing faster than the supply of high-quality text.
By Bishwas Mandal, Shmuel Berman, Akshay Vegesna, Samip Dahal
arXiv:2608. 07719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning repeatedly trains policies from a fixed transition pool, making redundant data costly across seeds and hyperparameters, while naive subsampling can remove rare transitions needed for long-horizon credit assignment.
By Ibne Farabi Shihab, Sanjeda Akter, Abu Sa-Adat Mohamed Moon-Im Al Ahsan, Md Najmus Swaqeeb, Anuj Sharma
The study investigates whether the usefulness of training samples depends on the data itself or on the learner. By fixing selected subsets and varying the learner, the authors show that the crossover point—where easy samples give way to coverage samples—shifts with changes in model width, input resolution, and architecture. This indicates that the boundary between easy and coverage samples is learner‑dependent rather than data‑dependent.
By Yangze Liu, Xiao-Long Yin, Zhongyi Han
LESS (Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search) is a data‑driven NAS method that uses a brief hard‑path warm‑up and CMA‑ES to evaluate candidate architectures as decoded hard genotypes after six supernet updates. On NAS‑Bench‑201, LESS attains 93.189 % CIFAR‑10 accuracy in just 409.1 seconds, nearly matching FairNAS while using only about 1/24 of its search time. The approach also transfers well to CIFAR‑100, ImageNet16‑120, and the larger DARTS space, achieving high accuracies with searches completed in roughly 43.5 minutes on a single GPU.
By Aviral Gandhi, Jinglue Xu, Jialong Li, Hitoshi Iba
arXiv:2608. 07303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Comparisons between AutoML systems at short time budgets -- tens of seconds rather than hours -- are common in tool READMEs and workshop papers, and they are easy to get wrong.
By Guilin Zhang, Kai Zhao
arXiv:2607. 09100v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of image data has produced large-scale datasets, raising concerns about the time and memory costs of model training.
By Pedro Rocha Dantas, Lucas Pascotti Valem
arXiv:2607. 01984v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Newer lightweight convolutional neural networks are often presented as improving predictive performance and deployment efficiency, but such claims require controlled evaluation.
By Tasnim Shahriar
The paper investigates KV‑cache eviction strategies for sparse‑attention models, showing that selecting the largest attention weights is nearly optimal—closing only a median 2–5 % of the gap to full attention. It further demonstrates that differences in performance between eviction methods largely stem from memory usage, with the new training‑free ContourKV allocator outperforming state‑of‑the‑art methods in most pairwise comparisons while matching their byte‑efficiency.
By Jack Shi, Jerry Gu
The paper introduces “PACE”, a training‑free framework that tackles bottlenecks in Retrieval‑Augmented Generation by frontloading evidence and adaptively budgeting reranking. It first reorders candidate documents based on marginal evidence coverage—prioritizing query‑relevant, complementary, and chain‑forming documents—providing a $(1-1/e)$ approximation guarantee. Then it dynamically adjusts the reranking budget according to the relative pressure of the reranker and the language model, improving evidence recall and reducing p95 latency in multi‑hop QA workloads.
By Weibin Cai, Reza Zafarani
RACE-AIMC is a framework that selects a single analog in‑memory computing (AIMC) accelerator from a pool to meet a specified energy budget while providing a mathematically exact upper bound on its error rate. Offline, it evaluates each chip, chooses the best one, and computes the bound; online, only that chip runs and a lightweight check decides whether to accept its output or defer to a fallback. Simulations show the certified error stays below 10% (mean 7.83%) and the system achieves clean‑digital accuracy while reducing energy use by about 69% compared to running all chips.
By Osama Yousuf, Martin Lueker-Boden