arXiv Machine Learning

RACE-AIMC: Selective Inference for Heterogeneous Analog In-Memory Accelerators at the Edge

RACE-AIMC is a framework that selects a single analog in‑memory computing (AIMC) accelerator from a pool to meet a specified energy budget while providing a mathematically exact upper bound on its error rate. Offline, it evaluates each chip, chooses the best one, and computes the bound; online, only that chip runs and a lightweight check decides whether to accept its output or defer to a fallback. Simulations show the certified error stays below 10% (mean 7.83%) and the system achieves clean‑digital accuracy while reducing energy use by about 69% compared to running all chips.

arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Are Coreset Selection Methods Worth Their Cost?

The paper evaluates coreset selection methods by incorporating both selection and training time into a unified wall‑clock budget, using a standardized benchmark across four datasets and multiple selectors. Across numerous budget anchors, simple random or full‑data training consistently outperforms sophisticated selectors, and selection costs are dominated by a full‑dataset scan that cannot be amortized. The study also identifies when subset reuse can justify selection and reports several correctness fixes in a popular codebase.

By Yangze Liu, Zhongyi Han
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Beyond Noise: Understanding and Overcoming Temperature Effects in Analog DNN Inference

The paper investigates how temperature affects analog deep neural network (DNN) inference, focusing on both stochastic and systematic non‑idealities in analog hardware. Experiments show that temperature‑induced performance loss is mainly driven by systematic errors rather than random noise. The study evaluates various mitigation techniques, finding that noise‑aware training and temperature‑aware calibration—especially hardware‑in‑the‑loop training—best preserve inference accuracy across different thermal conditions.

By Niklas Summ, Xiao Wang, Hendrik Borras, Bernhard Klein, Holger Fr\"oning
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Thought-Level Beam Search for Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 08020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time compute scaling is a primary driver of performance in large reasoning models (LRMs), but extreme inefficiency bounds current approaches, shifting the critical question from \emph{how much} compute to spend, to \emph{where} to allocate it.

By Lijie Yang, Hongyin Luo, Tri Dao, Ravi Netravali
arXiv AI
6d ago

The Inference Engineering Pareto Atlas: Which Optimizations Dominate the Cost, Quality, and Latency Frontier?

The paper presents a Pareto atlas of LLM inference optimizations, mapping cost, quality, and latency trade‑offs for Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct on L4, A100, and H100 GPUs. Using 54 measured configurations and a calibrated simulator, it identifies 18 of 36 setups on the Pareto frontier, showing that combined methods outperform single ones. Quality tests reveal that AWQ 4bit and FP8 weights offer significant latency reductions while largely preserving accuracy, but naive FP8 KV caching fails to answer any questions correctly.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv AI
Sep 12

DCO: Dynamic Cache Orchestration for LLM Accelerators through Predictive Management

The paper proposes DCO, a dynamic cache orchestration scheme for multi-core AI accelerators that uses application-aware policies and dataflow information to guide cache replacement, bypass decisions, and thrashing mitigation. Using a cycle-accurate simulator, the authors demonstrate up to 1.80× speedup over conventional cache architectures and validate the approach with an analytical model and RTL implementation. The design occupies 0.064 mm² on a 15 nm process and operates at 2 GHz, showing that a shared system-level cache can simplify programming while boosting performance for large language model workloads.

By Zhongchun Zhou, Chengtao Lai, Yuhang Gu, Wei Zhang