arXiv Computation and Language

Repetition, Not Length: Isolating the Counting Failure in Neural Text-to-Speech

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

When Is Noise Response Universal? Tokenization as the Hidden Variable in Language Models

The study investigates how textual neural models degrade when inputs contain noise such as typos, OCR errors, or dropped words. It finds that model performance decline is largely consistent across architectures under word‑level noise but diverges under character‑level noise, a difference attributed to tokenization rather than architecture. By applying a short contrastive training recipe, diverse encoders converge to a common robustness curve, enabling prediction of a model’s noise resilience and the ability to enhance robustness at specific noise scales through targeted training.

By Yefan Tao, Gerald Friedland, Luyang Kong
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

Reliable Neural-Codec Text-to-Speech by ASR Self-Verification and Distillation: Near-Zero Catastrophic Failures Across Models and Codecs

arXiv:2606. 18323v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open autoregressive neural-codec text-to-speech (TTS) models sound excellent on typical inputs yet suffer stochastic catastrophic failures: on a meaningful fraction of utterances they emit silence, terminate early, or collapse into repetitive or hallucinated content.

By Ali Asaria, Tony Salomone, Deep Gandhi
arXiv AI
Aug 28

FOCUS & RePAIR: Mitigating Text Degeneration via Token-Level Guidance for Pruned Large Language Models

The paper investigates how pruning large language models can lead to text degeneration, particularly repetition loops, even when perplexity and task accuracy stay stable. By treating decoding as a dynamical process, the authors separate degeneration into loop entry risk and loop persistence, showing that persistence depends on the escape mass given to plausible alternatives. They introduce two token‑level guidance objectives—FOCUS, which reweights distillation toward high‑confidence teacher regions, and RePAIR, which uses onset‑centered positive/negative continuation pairs with a margin loss—to reduce repetition and improve generation quality in pruned models.

By Junyoung Lee, Sehyeon Park, Shinhyoung Jang, Seonha Ryu, Hojeong Kim, Hyunsei Lee, Il Hong Suh, Yeseong Kim
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Internal Data Repetition Destroys Language Models

arXiv:2606. 24998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are running out of high-quality training data, and even aggressively deduplicated corpora retain some amount of repetition.

By Jessica Chudnovsky, Joshua Kazdan, Noam Levi, Rylan Schaeffer, Yegor Denisov-Blanch, Bo He, Mehmet Donmez, Sanmi Koyejo, David Donoho
arXiv AI
Jul 28

Bayesian Repetition Penalty: A Principled Adjacent-Conditional Framework for Reversing Attention Collapse in Autoregressive Language Models

arXiv:2607. 22694v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Attention collapse in autoregressive language models -- manifested as repetitive token loops where the model becomes trapped in self-reinforcing attractors -- is a persistent pathology that existing decoding-time heuristics fail to address at its root cause.

By Wenjie Fan, Bin Ma, Dong Li
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Do Spoken Language Models Hear Speech as They Read Text? Bridging Structural Gaps Between Speech and Text

The paper investigates how Spoken Language Models (SLMs) process speech compared to text, noting that current SLMs show weak alignment between speech and text representations despite strong downstream performance. The authors propose a framework that separates length mismatch from semantic alignment to better match speech and text representations. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that this approach yields competitive results against strong baselines, highlighting the need to explicitly address structural differences between speech and text in SLM training.

By Hyeonyu Kim, Hwayeon Kim, Youngwon Choi, Myeongkyun Cho, Huu-Kim Nguyen
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 25

PTC-Bias: Phoneme-Level Temporal Competition for Bias Retrieval and Post-Decoding Correction in Speech LLMs

PTC-Bias is a two-stage framework that improves contextual biasing in speech large language models by using phoneme-level temporal competition. In the first stage, PTC Retrieval performs frame-synchronous phoneme decoding to generate a compact shortlist of bias words and their speech intervals. The second stage, PTC Correction, applies a local competition between retrieved candidates and mismatched transcript spans within those intervals, reducing near-homophone and word-segmentation errors without extra SpeechLLM passes. Experiments on LibriSpeech demonstrate consistent gains across two SpeechLLMs, with PTC-Bias reducing B-WER by up to 23.9% relative to CTC-Filter while keeping U-WER nearly unchanged.

By Zhiqi Ai, Han Cheng, Shiyi Mu, Yongjin Zhou, Shugong Xu