Ambiguous Strategic Classification
arXiv:2606. 10137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A common assumption in strategic classification is that the classifier is public knowledge.
arXiv:2606. 30136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humans facing algorithmic decision systems have been found to ``game'' them by altering their input data (at a cost to them) in order to favorably change the algorithmic outcomes they receive (at a cost to the algorithm).
arXiv:2606. 10137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A common assumption in strategic classification is that the classifier is public knowledge.
arXiv:2606. 28204v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Algorithmic developments in Strategic Classification have been mostly limited to linear classifiers in settings where the best response has a closed-form solution or can be easily approximated.
The paper tackles the single‑machine scheduling problem of minimizing total completion time in a non‑clairvoyant setting, where job processing times are unknown until completion. It introduces a robustness framework that uses a classification model’s confusion matrix to describe uncertainty as permutations within predicted classes, avoiding the computational challenges of traditional robust metrics. The authors present an optimal non‑adaptive strategy for three robust criteria and show that adaptive and randomized algorithms can outperform it when the confusion matrix has certain structural properties.
arXiv:2606. 01198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Strategic classification studies settings in which agents respond to a deployed classifier by modifying observable features at a cost.
arXiv:2605. 19674v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Strategic classification(SC) studies the interaction between decision models and agents who strategically manipulate their features for favorable outcomes.
arXiv:2608. 07139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Uncertainty quantification is essential when deploying machine learning models in safety-critical applications.
arXiv:2606. 12587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditionally, decision support studies how humans use machine learning models to make better decisions.
arXiv:2510. 07750v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robust optimization safeguards decisions against uncertainty by optimizing against worst-case scenarios, yet their effectiveness hinges on a prespecified robustness level that is often chosen ad hoc, leading to either insufficient protection or overly conservative and costly solutions.
arXiv:2606. 05551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable decision making pipelines powered by machine learning models require uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods that come with explicit safety guarantees.
arXiv:2606. 00002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) decision engines routinely output nominally optimal plans for high-stakes industrial systems.
arXiv:2606. 19883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a multi-agent multi-armed bandit problem in the competitive setup with two-sided matching markets under a human centric decision making model.
arXiv:2608. 09036v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study decision-focused learning (DFL) in shortest-path network interdiction (SPNI) games, a Stackelberg game where an interdictor (leader) strengthens the networks' arcs against attacks, while an evader (follower) who is uncertain about costs of attacking network arcs relies on a machine-learned predictor to identify the shortest path.