arXiv AI
The Retriever Should Remember: Experience-Amortized Reranking for Long-Term Agent Memory
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 14
Tool-Adaptive LLM Reranker
arXiv:2607. 10555v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized information retrieval, yet their strictly parametric nature frequently leads to severe factual hallucinations when confronted with complex queries beyond their epistemic boundaries.
arXiv AI
Jul 2
Learning User-Aware Recall: Personalized Retrieval in Long-Term Conversational Memory
arXiv:2607. 00017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term conversational agents are expected to remember past interactions, but memory is useful only when the right evidence is recalled for the right user.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Optimizing RAG Rerankers with LLM Feedback via Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2604. 02091v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15
Efficient Rationale-based Retrieval: On-policy Distillation from Generative Rerankers based on JEPA
arXiv:2604. 23336v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unlike traditional fact-based retrieval, rationale-based retrieval typically necessitates cross-encoding of query-document pairs using large language models, incurring substantial computational costs.
arXiv AI
Jun 12
Learning What to Remember: A Cognitively Grounded Multi-Factor Value Model for Agentic Memory
arXiv:2606. 12945v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-running LLM agents accumulate interaction histories far larger than any context window, forcing a standing decision: what to encode deeply, what to forget, and what to retrieve under a fixed memory budget.
arXiv AI
Jul 21
Beyond Memory Leaderboards: Evaluating Scientific Memory as Budgeted Context Restoration
arXiv:2607. 16848v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is becoming a core component of LLM agents, but most memory benchmarks evaluate conversations or compact summaries, while research agents need to restore evidence from full scientific papers.