arXiv Machine Learning

SPIN: Decentralized Swarm Control via Tensorized Policy Coordination

arXiv:2606. 07557v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decentralized multi-agent swarm coordination on resource-constrained edge platforms remains fundamentally bottlenecked by the exponential scaling of joint action spaces and high-latency communication overhead.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Optimization without Future Compromises? Decentralized Coordination via Collective and Reinforcement Learning

The paper introduces Hierarchical Reinforcement and Collective Learning (HRCL), a framework that combines multi‑agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with decentralized coordination. HRCL uses MARL at a high level to generate strategic guidance that limits the decision space for low‑level agents, enabling efficient short‑term coordination while considering long‑term effects. Experiments on synthetic, energy‑management, and drone‑swarm scenarios demonstrate faster convergence and significant reductions in system‑wide and individual costs compared to standalone MARL.

By Chuhao Qin, Evangelos Pournaras
arXiv AI
4d ago

Physics-Informed Multi-Agent Coordination for Hospital Patient Flow Optimization

The paper introduces a Physics‑Informed Multi‑Agent Coordination framework that embeds calibrated BCMP queueing topologies into a decentralized multi‑agent reinforcement learning system for hospital patient flow. It formulates the problem as a Decentralized Partially Observable Markov Decision Process with coupled resource constraints, enabling departmental agents to negotiate patient routing and service scaling while exchanging localized action fingerprints to handle non‑stationarity. Empirical tests on MIMIC‑IV data show the approach reduces cumulative system delay compared to static Markovian models, heuristic dispatching, and independent multi‑agent baselines, all while preserving clinical safety constraints.

By Guoqing Zhang, Rafik Hadfi, Takayuki Ito
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

HySTAR: Anchored Hypergraphs for Stable Credit Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

HySTAR is a MAPPO-based framework that addresses structural target drift in cooperative multi‑agent reinforcement learning by anchoring an overlapping sparse hypergraph as a stable high‑order value‑decomposition scaffold. It separates adaptive representation learning from a temporally consistent decomposition basis, using a spatiotemporal encoder to capture physical and task‑dependent interactions and combining temporal and structural relevance to compute agent‑specific advantages. Experiments on SMAC, GRF, Traffic Junction, and MPE show consistent improvements over MAPPO‑style, value‑factorization, and dynamic‑grouping baselines, achieving significant gains in performance and convergence speed.

By Xinglong Luo, Yuding Zhang, Yuheng Kuang, Shuxuan Yuan, Zhenni Zeng, Weiqiang Zhu, Zhenhai Ji, Zhengning Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Agentic AI Networking for Heterogeneous Unmanned Aerial Systems in Low-Altitude Wireless Networks

The paper introduces a hierarchical hybrid architecture combining large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to manage heterogeneous unmanned aerial systems in low‑altitude wireless networks (LAWNs). An outer LLM‑driven loop interprets service requirements and operator intent to reconfigure objectives and resource priorities, while an inner MARL loop executes decentralized policies under the updated game. A logistics‑monitoring case study demonstrates the framework’s ability to coordinate diverse services and adapt to changing conditions without retraining the MARL policies.

By Nguyen Duc Minh Quang, Chang Liu, Shuangyang Li, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22

General Collaborative Intelligence: Architecting Cognition for Resilient Multi-Agent Ecosystems

The paper reviews the evolution of multi‑agent unmanned systems from isolated sensing to collaborative intelligence, where agents share compact features to overcome local observation limits such as occlusions and sensor range. It introduces a five‑dimensional taxonomy (collaboration stage, communication paradigm, fusion architecture, learning strategy, application domain) and three cognitive synergy conditions (Semantic Disambiguation, Pragmatic Information Exchange, Proactive Informational Foraging) to unify existing research. The authors survey architectures, neural‑communication co‑design, embodied action‑perception loops, and resilience mechanisms, map advances onto operational domains (V2X, UAV, logistics, smart cities), and propose the GCI‑Bench scoring protocol to standardize evaluation across studies.

By Lei Zhang, Chun Ye, Le Yang, Zhaozhong Wang, Deng-Ping Fan, Hang Dai, Binglu Wang