We introduce Predictive State Retrieval (PSR), a task in which a model observes a short video prefix and a temporal question about an object's future state, then retrieves instances from other videos or images that depict that state. Unlike action anticipation, which predicts a label, moment retrieval, which localizes an observed event within a video, or video generation, which synthesizes pixels, PSR combines anticipation with cross-instance retrieval across multiple temporal horizons.
The paper evaluates 14 state‑of‑the‑art text‑to‑video retrieval models on three major datasets using a unified framework. It finds that short, clear, and simple captions—especially those describing single actions or color attributes—yield higher recall, while complex, multi‑step events or fine‑grained scene descriptions remain difficult for all models. Attention‑driven architectures better handle temporally dependent or multi‑step queries, whereas dual‑encoder and multimodal fusion models excel mainly on simpler captions, and cross‑dataset generalization improves with larger, more diverse caption sets but generative captions do not consistently boost accuracy.
By Maria-Eirini Pegia, Dimitrios Stefanopoulos, Bj\"orn {\TH}\'or J\'onsson, Anastasia Moumtzidou, Ilias Gialampoukidis, Stefanos Vrochidis, Ioannis Kompatsiaris
VidOmni-Bench is a new benchmark for fine‑grained video understanding that asks models to verify whether each event in dense video captions is supported by the video. It contains 500 videos covering five complexity types and durations from 4 seconds to 90 minutes, and uses human‑verified sentence‑level labels to create hard negatives. Experiments show that Video‑LLMs often hallucinate events, struggle to detect incorrect descriptions, and exhibit varying weaknesses depending on video complexity and duration.
By Changbeen Kim, Junwon Chang, Kipyo Kim, Risa Shinoda, Kuniaki Saito, Donghyun Kim
arXiv:2606. 06294v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Temporal Grounding (TG) aims to localize video segments corresponding to a textual query.
By Qi Xu, Yue Tan, Shihao Chen, Jiahao Meng, Anna Wang, Shunping Ji, Hao Fei, Jason Li
The paper introduces PRISM, a method for recognizing procedural mistakes in videos by grounding video segments in language and mapping them to procedural states using a lightweight hidden Markov model trained on correct executions. It aligns reference annotations with four edit-based error types—insertions, deletions, substitutions, and transpositions—to evaluate across heterogeneous benchmarks. Experiments on three datasets show that using language grounding, semantic role labeling, and a trained local decoder consistently improves mistake detection performance compared to nearest-candidate matching.
By Olga Loginova, Oleksandr Bezrukov, Frank Keller
ShotFinder introduces a new benchmark for open‑domain video shot retrieval, formalizing editing requirements as keyframe‑oriented shot descriptions and adding five controllable constraints—temporal order, color, visual style, audio, and resolution. The benchmark comprises 1,210 high‑quality YouTube samples across 20 themes, generated with large models and verified by humans. A three‑stage retrieval pipeline—query expansion via video imagination, candidate video retrieval, and description‑guided shot localization—shows a notable performance gap to humans, especially for color and visual style constraints.
By Tao Yu, Haopeng Jin, Hao Wang, Shenghua Chai, Yujia Yang, Junhao Gong, Jiaming Guo, Minghui Zhang, Xinlong Chen, Zhenghao Zhang, Yuxuan Zhou, Yufei Xiong, Shanbin Zhang, Jiabing Yang, YiFan Zhang, Hongzhu Yi, Xinming Wang, Cheng Zhong, Xiao Ma, Zhang Zhang, Yan Huang, Liang Wang
arXiv:2604.17422v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Long video understanding remains a formidable challenge for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) due to the prohibitive cost of processing dens...
By Shaoguang Wang, Weiyu Guo, Ziyang Chen, Xuming Hu, Hui Xiong
MARS introduces a multi‑layer, multi‑slot embedding framework for text‑video retrieval that constructs adaptive representation slots by combining hidden states from different decoder layers. By comparing corresponding text and video slots and aggregating their similarities, MARS captures fine‑grained cues that single‑token embeddings miss. A hard‑negative‑aware slot specialization objective further encourages slots to focus on discriminative matching cues, leading to state‑of‑the‑art results on four benchmarks.
By Uicheol Jung, Juyoung Hong, Geuntaek Lim, Yukyung Choi
arXiv:2610.08674v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current large video-language models (LVLMs) still face challenges when dealing with long videos, mainly because frames are often processed independentl...
By Yuhao Qin, Junbo Wang, Yuke Li, Yining Zhu
arXiv:2608.23329v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Open-world video understanding often requires a model to locate sparse visual evidence and acquire external knowledge that is absent from the video a...
By Wenqi Liu, Shijie Ma, Yunxiao Wang, Meng Liu, Qile Su, Han Liu, Bohan Hou, Xuanyu Zheng, Changyi Liu, Tianke Zhang, Haonan Fan, Kaiyu Jiang, Yingxin Li, Jiankang Chen, Xu Wang, Bin Wen, Tingting Gao, Han Li, Jianhua Yin, Yinwei Wei, Xuemeng Song
MEV is a multi‑event video dataset created to support long‑take video generation. It contains high‑quality real‑world videos where subjects perform distinct, non‑overlapping events with precise temporal boundaries and fine‑grained procedural annotations. The dataset includes a comprehensive annotation pipeline that segments videos into temporally grounded events and generates structured captions at both global and event levels, enabling event‑centric evaluation and improved long‑take event transitions in generation experiments.
By Peiyuan Zhu, Shaoan Xie, Yifan Shen, Wen Tian, Zijian Li, Guangyi Chen, Kun Zhang
TimeBlind is a diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate fine‑grained spatio‑temporal compositionality in video large language models (LLMs). It categorizes temporal understanding into three levels—atomic event recognition, event property characterization, and reasoning about event interdependencies—and uses a minimal‑pairs paradigm where video pairs share identical static content but differ only in temporal structure. Across 20 state‑of‑the‑art MLLMs tested on 600 curated instances, the best model achieved only 48.2% instance accuracy, far below human performance of 98.2%, highlighting a reliance on static visual shortcuts rather than true temporal reasoning.
By Baiqi Li, Kangyi Zhao, Ce Zhang, Chancharik Mitra, Jean de Dieu Nyandwi, Gedas Bertasius