The paper "Query Implied Generative Engine Optimization" introduces QI‑GEO, a method that infers user intent directly from documents to enhance visibility in Generative Search Engines. By approximating a document’s intent space, QI‑GEO identifies missing yet relevant content, improving objective scores by up to 15.9% and subjective scores by up to 17.6% on GEO‑Bench datasets. The approach yields nearly twice as many citation gains as losses, demonstrating that document‑derived intent approximations can boost content visibility without explicit query inputs.
arXiv:2510. 11560v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The advent of LLMs has given rise to generative search, a new search paradigm in which LLMs retrieve information from the web related to a query and synthesize it into a single, coherent response.
Agent2UCB is a new agentic system designed for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), which refines content to boost its likelihood of being cited or summarized by generative AI search engines. The system autonomously evaluates nine GEO strategies for each content item, selects the most effective one, and speeds up this selection using a bandit-based Agent2UCB policy that blends large language model priors with real-time reward signals. Additionally, it offers a lightweight, text-only SEO readiness check that assesses readability, topical coverage, and EEAT-style credibility, and experiments on GEO-Bench demonstrate consistent visibility gains while maintaining SEO quality.
arXiv:2602. 12187v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Search-Augmented Generative Engines (SAGE) have emerged as a new paradigm for information access, bridging web-scale retrieval with generative capabilities to deliver synthesized answers.
arXiv:2608. 16824v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) modifies web content to increase its likelihood of being selected and cited by generative search engines.
arXiv:2606. 02814v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural retrievers are trained to estimate query-document relevance from annotated query-document pairs.
Clarify-Then-Search is a benchmark that tests whether large language models can ask clarification questions to improve the usefulness of deep search results. It uses 518 real-world query pairs from Baidu, where each intent query is paired with an underspecified version. The evaluation involves a clarifier asking up to three questions, a user answerer providing only explicit information, and a rewriter generating a new query that is then searched; performance is measured by a weighted nugget-recall score.
arXiv:2603.16138v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative search systems are increasingly replacing link-based retrieval with AI-generated summaries, yet little is known about how these sy...
Intent-Driven Dynamic Chunking (IDC) segments documents by predicting user queries with a Large Language Model and then applying dynamic programming to find optimal chunk boundaries. This method outperforms traditional fixed-length or coherence-based segmentation on five out of six question-answering datasets, improving top-1 retrieval accuracy by 5% to 67% and reducing the number of chunks by 40–60% while maintaining 93–100% answer coverage. IDC demonstrates that aligning document structure with anticipated information needs can significantly boost retrieval performance for long and heterogeneous documents.
arXiv:2606. 14817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of a system for generating personalized reading content using Large Language Models (LLMs) combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
The study examines how conversational LLM agents—specifically ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and DeepSeek—use Web search, combining real user interactions with controlled API experiments. It finds that agents differ in when they decide to search, how they craft queries, and which domains they favor, and that more frequent searching does not always improve answer quality. While most responses are grounded in search results, some claims are unsupported, raising attribution concerns.
arXiv:2603. 08924v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI-powered answer engines are inherently non-deterministic: identical queries submitted at different times can produce different responses and cite different sources.
arXiv:2609.15094v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In industrial recommendation feeds, presenting a static headline for an item often fails to satisfy the diverse, multimodal interests of the user pop...