The study examines how language influences AI chatbot responses to questions about the war in Ukraine, revealing that the same AI systems (GPT, Claude, Gemini) produce varying political stances across 112 languages. By evaluating 20 statements in 112 languages, the researchers found that Russia‑leaning versus Ukraine‑leaning answers differ by language, mirroring global political attitudes such as public support for Russia, UN voting patterns, and aid levels. This pattern persists across all three models and even when specific statement pairs are removed, suggesting that information warfare could embed geopolitical biases into AI training data.
By Maxim Chupilkin
arXiv:2606. 07722v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article offers a perspective on the nature of chatbots as genuine conversation partners when discussing problems in relation to their solutions.
By S. F. M. van Vlijmen, H. D. Lethe jr
arXiv:2501. 14844v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Detecting biases in the outputs produced by generative models is essential to reduce the potential risks associated with their application in critical settings.
By Erica Coppolillo, Giuseppe Manco, Luca Maria Aiello
Propaganda detection is an essential task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in the context of manipulative political communications. However, identifying specific propaganda technique...
arXiv:2610.03077v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Propaganda detection is an essential task in natural language processing (NLP), particularly in the context of manipulative political communications. H...
By Claudiu Creanga, Ioachim Lihor, Liviu P. Dinu
The paper presents an agentic framework for detecting conspiratorial content in social media by inferring the speaker’s intent rather than merely identifying explicit claims. It leverages social context and adaptive tool use, demonstrating superior performance over text-only and non-agentic models on a large Hebrew tweet dataset spanning election cycles and the COVID pandemic. The study highlights the importance of context-aware, reasoning-driven approaches for accurate conspiracy detection.
By Lior Biton, Oren Tsur
arXiv:2610.05275v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: A large part of political discourse on social media is built and expressed at a level of claims: i.e. declarative, typically single-clause statemen...
By Sandrine Chausson, Bj\"orn Ross
The paper introduces BenCoDiC, a large Bengali cyberbullying corpus focused on political news discourse. It contains 50,250 textual instances from 100 YouTube videos, preserving caption–comment–reply relationships and organized via a nine‑dimensional star schema. A two‑tier human annotation process achieved high reliability (Fleiss' κ = 0.86, Krippendorff's α = 0.86), and transformer experiments show that adding conversational context modestly improves classification over isolated text.
By Md. Nesarul Hoque, Rudra Pratap Deb Nath, Umme Salma, Shima Chakraborty, Md. Hanif Seddiqui
arXiv:2610.20370v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Hate speech has become increasingly prevalent on social media, raising concerns about its detection, interpretation, and moderation. Persian, a relativ...
By Ghazal Kalhor, Sima Kamandloo, Mehrsa Shamsian, Behnam Bahrak
arXiv:2607.04962v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Conspiracy theories commonly attribute important events to the actions of powerful and secretive actors. While computational research has largely f...
By Helena Mihaljevi\'c, Jolanda Beer, Mareike Lisker, Katharina Soemer
The article examines chatbots as partners in problem‑solving conversations, arguing that basic chatbots—comprising a large language model (LLM) and a simple interface—are multifaceted but cannot match human cognitive flexibility. Drawing on Aggregation Dynamics, Cognitive Linguistics, Neuropsychology, and Psychology, the authors describe how LLMs encode artificial metaphorical problem propagations from training data, which only partially imitate human thinking. They conclude that further LLM development will not yield true thinking partners, yet chatbots are widely used, making their understanding socially and politically important.
By S. F. M. van Vlijmen, H. D. Lethe jr
arXiv:2608. 06589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While large language model outputs are frequently analysed as a collective super variety termed "AI language," this chapter argues that this perspective coexists with distinct, model-specific linguistic signatures akin to human idiolects.
By Karolina Rudnicka, Thomas Stephan Juzek