The article reports on an experiment where an AI agent was allowed to search for evidence whenever it chose. The agent discovered some papers that a standard search missed, but also lost some that the plain search had found, and overall the gains were insufficient to be trusted. The post examines whether agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) truly retrieves better evidence across 298 questions.
The article examines whether an apartment search agent can reduce the number of times it calls a predictive model while still identifying suitable matches. The author conducted 2,500 listing checks using Weights & Biases Weave, systematically eliminating unnecessary model computations, and evaluated each iteration against consistent reference answers.
I built four AI retrieval architectures on a laptop and benchmarked them against the same set of documents and questions. Here’s what the results taught me about the trade-offs between plain RAG, grap...
A minimal OpenAI Agents SDK implementation where retrieval becomes a search-read-decide loop The post Agentic RAG: Let the Agent Search appeared first on Towards Data Science .
The article explains that Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a retrieval system, while agents are responsible for action. The author built a distinct layer that explicitly connects retrieval to action, and tested this setup across nine tasks alongside standalone RAG and agent systems.
arXiv:2509. 00761v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models are increasingly deployed for legal question answering, where evaluations typically focus on multiple-choice accuracy.
arXiv:2607.10198v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Search APIs expose ranked snippets, URLs, and metadata on which agents decide whether to answer, search again, or fetch pages. We evaluate these in...
The article discusses the importance of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system providing clear evidence when it states that information is not present in a document. It outlines four distinct types of evidence that should accompany such a claim to avoid presenting a confident but incorrect answer or an unsupported “no answer.” The piece emphasizes that each evidence type serves as a safeguard against misinformation in enterprise document intelligence.
The paper investigates why large language models (LLMs) sometimes give outdated answers even when recent evidence is available through web search. By creating temporal facts that changed after the models’ training cutoffs, the authors evaluate a proprietary model with deployed search and six open-weight models with controlled retrieval. They find that models often rely on search snippets without opening source pages, leading to more outdated answers and unfaithful citations, and that even when retrieved evidence influences internal predictions, the final answer may still favor outdated information.
arXiv:2609.39026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Research agents synthesize evidence into cited reports, yet a well-cited report can still reach a misleading conclusion. Citation correctness chec...
The retrieval layer that helps AI systems navigate, read, and verify information inside even the most complex documents
The article argues that Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is only one tool in NLP, and many real-world problems—such as request classification, free‑text matching, table reading, and OCR noise cleaning—are better served by simpler, cheaper techniques. It emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate method for each task and highlights the engineering challenge of knowing which technique to apply.
The article discusses how agentic AI is reshaping the analytics stack by taking over more execution tasks. It raises the question of which responsibilities should remain with human analysts versus AI agents and explores the importance of this distinction. The piece highlights the evolving role of AI in analytics and the need to define clear boundaries between human and machine work.