arXiv:2608. 12624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Structure-preserving machine learning embeds physical structure directly into model architectures, yet uncertainty quantification (UQ) for such hard-constrained models remains limited because standard UQ methods may violate the encoded admissibility conditions, require architectural modifications, or impose substantial computational costs.
By Zequn He, Celia Reina
arXiv:2604. 07366v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, but solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.
By Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Xiaowei Jia, Runlong Yu
arXiv:2603. 11249v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurate prediction of phase equilibria remains a central challenge in chemical engineering.
By Karim K. Ben Hicham, Moreno Ascani, Jan G. Rittig, Alexander Mitsos
arXiv:2606. 24999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) with unknown coefficients arise widely in scientific machine learning, including continuous-time reinforcement learning, yet solving them efficiently in a data-driven way remains challenging.
By Yanwei Jia, Du Ouyang, Huy\^en Pham, Xun Yu Zhou
arXiv:2603.27936v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are ubiquitous in mathematical physics and engineering. Although Physics-Informed Neural Netw...
By Sean Disar\`o, Ruma Rani Maity, Aras Bacho
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Heechang Kim, Qianying Cao, Hyomin Shin, Seungchul Lee, George Em Karniadakis, Minseok Choi
arXiv:2607. 25608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding governing physical laws into deep neural networks.
By Pinki Khatun, M. Sajid, Abhinav Jha, M. Tanveer
arXiv:2601. 21284v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diffusion models have emerged as powerful generative tools for modeling complex data distributions, yet their purely data-driven nature limits applicability in engineering and scientific problems where physical laws must be respected.
By Tianyi Zeng, Tianyi Wang, Jiaru Zhang, Zimo Zeng, Feiyang Zhang, Yiming Xu, Sikai Chen, Junfeng Jiao, Christian Claudel, Xinbo Chen
arXiv:2606. 04000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a probabilistic modeling framework for incorporating small-scale spatial heterogeneity into macroscopic descriptions of material behavior for polycrystalline metallic materials.
By Pouria Behnoudfar, Deekshith Naidu Ponnana, Noah J. Schmelzer, Janith Wanni, George T. Gray III, Dan J. Thoma, Curt A. Bronkhorst, Nan Chen, Wenxiao Pan
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
The paper introduces a physics-constrained neural network surrogate that learns the microstructural evolution of binary mixtures governed by the Cahn‑Hilliard equation. By imposing conservation of the order parameter as a hard constraint on the network output, the model accurately predicts long‑time phase‑separation dynamics for both critical and off‑critical mixtures, maintaining mixture composition and matching the Lifshitz‑Slyozov domain‑growth law. A variant that enforces conservation only through a penalty term drifts from the initial composition and loses predictive accuracy over long rollouts, underscoring the necessity of the hard constraint for stability.
By Vijay Yadav, Pallvi Pandey, Madhu Priya, Manish Dev Shrimali, Prabhat K. Jaiswal
arXiv:2607. 26490v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their performance heavily relies on the manual, trial-and-error engineering of neural representations, loss formulations, and optimization dynamics.
By Peng Yin, Kai Li, Yifan Zhang, Jian Cheng