arXiv:2601. 10237v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is the dominant paradigm for private training, but its fundamental limitations under worst-case adversarial privacy definitions remain poorly understood.
By Murat Bilgehan Ertan, Marten van Dijk
arXiv:2602. 17284v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We consider the privacy amplification properties of a sampling scheme in which a user's data isused in $k$ steps chosen randomly and uniformly from a sequence (or set) of $t$ steps.
By Vitaly Feldman, Moshe Shenfeld
arXiv:2407. 04884v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The hidden state threat model of differential privacy (DP) assumes that the adversary has access only to the final trained machine learning (ML) model, without seeing intermediate states during training.
By Rob Romijnders, Antti Koskela
arXiv:2601. 14033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly served behind APIs.
By Xiaochen Zhu, Mayuri Sridhar, Srinivas Devadas
arXiv:2609.37344v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivat...
By Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli
arXiv:2505. 22703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many problems in trustworthy ML can be expressed as constraints on prediction rates across subpopulations, including group fairness constraints (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.
By Mohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart, Aur\'elien Bellet, Nicolas Papernot
arXiv:2605. 24042v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Of $1{,}536$ Gaussian release covariances we tested for single-layer hidden-state privacy, zero achieve both moderate utility and moderate privacy against an adaptive retrieval attacker.
By Alexander Okezue Bell
arXiv:2608.28198v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Privacy-preserving learning is often motivated by the idea that protecting users' data can preserve trust and thus participation, improving utility in...
By Uddalak Mukherjee, Edwige Cyffers, Yann Chevaleyre
arXiv:2606. 01719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models trained on sensitive data can inadvertently leak population-level information about their training distributions -- a threat known as distribution inference attack (DIA).
By Rakshit Naidu
arXiv:2609.15847v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This paper proposes FREDI (Fair Resource Allocation for Edge Dual-Threshold Inference), a secure wireless edge-intelligence framework for event-trigg...
By Thai T. Vu, John Le, Tu N. Nguyen, Jun Shen, Quang Vinh Duong, Ha Nguyen
The paper introduces Private Best-of-N (PrivBoN), a method that adds calibrated Gumbel noise to reward scores during inference-time alignment, achieving both ε-differential privacy and KL-regularized alignment. When the privacy budget exceeds a critical threshold ε*, the noise becomes regret-optimal, matching the theoretical alignment skyline. The authors also propose Private Inference-Time Pessimism (PrivITP), which uses χ^2-regularized rejection sampling and a two-phase Gaussian mechanism to provide ex-post (ε,δ)-DP with a privacy cost independent of the number of responses, and demonstrate that both methods outperform standard Best-of-N across multiple models and datasets.
By Ishi Jain, Nandini Bhattad, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
arXiv:2601. 17360v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: An adversary observing a model's released prediction can infer sensitive attributes of the queried input, or even reconstruct representatives of the model's training data.
By Jiankai Jin, Xiangzheng Zhang, Zhao Liu, Wenzhuo Xu, Dongdong Yang, Deyue Zhang, Quanchen Zou