arXiv:2601. 10237v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) is the dominant paradigm for private training, but its fundamental limitations under worst-case adversarial privacy definitions remain poorly understood.
By Murat Bilgehan Ertan, Marten van Dijk
arXiv:2602. 01607v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Differentially private synthetic data enables the sharing and analysis of sensitive datasets while providing rigorous privacy guarantees for individual contributors.
By Rundong Ding, Yiyun He, Yizhe Zhu
arXiv:2505. 22703v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many problems in trustworthy ML can be expressed as constraints on prediction rates across subpopulations, including group fairness constraints (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.
By Mohammad Yaghini, Tudor Cebere, Michael Menart, Aur\'elien Bellet, Nicolas Papernot
arXiv:2608. 02480v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With AI systems gaining more access to individuals' information, it is important to protect privacy when reporting statistical answers.
By Jinwon Sohn, Veronika Ro\v{c}kov\'a
arXiv:2411.16478v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Measuring distribution drifts is a key task in managing distributed, sensitive data, as it underpins a wide range of federated learning and analyti...
By Sayan Biswas, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple, Mary Scott
arXiv:2505. 14251v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the problem of differentially private second moment estimation and present a new algorithm that achieve strong privacy-utility trade-offs even for worst-case inputs under subsamplability assumptions on the data.
By Bar Mahpud, Or Sheffet
The paper introduces Private Best-of-N (PrivBoN), a method that adds calibrated Gumbel noise to reward scores during inference-time alignment, achieving both ε-differential privacy and KL-regularized alignment. When the privacy budget exceeds a critical threshold ε*, the noise becomes regret-optimal, matching the theoretical alignment skyline. The authors also propose Private Inference-Time Pessimism (PrivITP), which uses χ^2-regularized rejection sampling and a two-phase Gaussian mechanism to provide ex-post (ε,δ)-DP with a privacy cost independent of the number of responses, and demonstrate that both methods outperform standard Best-of-N across multiple models and datasets.
By Ishi Jain, Nandini Bhattad, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
arXiv:2609.37344v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivat...
By Max Cairney-Leeming, Simone Bombari, Marco Mondelli
arXiv:2603. 19040v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differentially private wireless federated learning (DPWFL) is a promising framework for protecting sensitive user data.
By Chen Yaoling, Liang Hao, Tu Xiaotong
With AI systems gaining more access to individuals' information, it is important to protect privacy when reporting statistical answers. Equally important is to privatize the reporting of uncertainty in such answers.
arXiv:2606. 02563v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity.
By Farhin Farhad Riya, Olivera Kotevska, Jinyuan Stella Sun
The paper introduces Fulcrum, a topology‑aware differential privacy scheme for hierarchical federated learning that allocates noise based on the size and exposure of regional aggregation groups. By deriving a closed‑form exposure dispersion metric from region structure and weights, the method optimally balances privacy and utility, achieving up to 14.84% accuracy gains on image tasks and 12.16% on text tasks at ε = 0.99 compared to uniform noise allocation. The approach ensures each participant receives noise commensurate with its actual exposure, eliminating unnecessary privacy overhead.
By Murtaza Rangwala, Richard O. Sinnott, Rajkumar Buyya