arXiv:2604. 05324v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Statistical evaluation aims to estimate the generalization performance of a model using held-out i.
arXiv:2501. 18897v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models have achieved remarkable success across a range of applications, yet their evaluation still lacks principled uncertainty quantification.
arXiv:2402.04355v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a likelihood-free method for comparing two distributions given samples from each, with the goal of assessing the quality of genera...
arXiv:2609.01410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative data augmentation is widely used to mitigate class imbalance, yet its theoretical effect on downstream generalization remains poorly under...
arXiv:2607. 24983v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative models are increasingly adopted in distributionally robust optimization (DRO), but existing approaches trade off model compatibility and adversarial structure: methods that accept arbitrary samplers do not restrict worst-case laws to a generator family, while generator-parameterized adversaries rely on model-specific access such as likelihoods, scores, or training data.
arXiv:2509. 21925v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper investigates the theoretical behavior of generative models under finite training populations.
arXiv:2310. 11714v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ranking generative models based on the fidelity and diversity of their outputs is required to identify the best generator in a group of candidate generative AI models.
arXiv:2609.23789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern conditional generative models face significant challenges when learning complex covariate dependencies. While sufficient dimension reduction (SD...
arXiv:2607. 04360v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conditional generative models have emerged as powerful tools for sampling from target conditional distributions, driving substantial advances across a wide range of scientific and applied domains.
arXiv:2511. 02414v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the recent success of generative models in image and text, the question of their evaluation has recently gained a lot of attention.
The paper introduces techniques for measuring the robustness of predictions made by two generative classifiers—naive Bayes classifiers and generative forests—whose underlying models are probabilistic graphical models. Robustness is defined as the degree to which the classifier’s distribution can be perturbed without altering its prediction, with perturbations explored via epsilon‑contamination, total variation distance, and chi‑squared divergence neighborhoods. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that the computed robustness values can serve as indicators of prediction trustworthiness and are compared against other existing indicators.
arXiv:2606. 08417v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion and continuous flow-based language models have emerged as the leading non-autoregressive alternatives to language modeling.
arXiv:2607. 05046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating generative AI models is a routine, but resource-intensive, process that is conducted over and over again during the course of model development.