arXiv:2608. 06409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech language models are increasingly evaluated on paralinguistic tasks by the accuracy of prompted answers, but answer accuracy combines failures at different stages of the audio-to-answer computation.
By Linkai Peng, Baorian Nuchged
The paper presents an interpretable, fair, and accurately benchmarked automated system for assessing second‑language English speaking. Using a hybrid of feature‑based speech‑timing metrics and a large language model (LLM) fluency judgment, the system achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.818 with the ICNALE Global Rating Archive, outperforming 81 % of trained human raters. A controlled study shows that encoding pauses into the LLM prompt does not meaningfully affect fluency scores, indicating that the system’s fluency signal derives from measurable speech‑timing features.
By Eichi Uehara
The paper evaluates post‑training quantization (PTQ) for text‑to‑speech (TTS) models across multiple architectures using a unified protocol. It shows that reducing weights to 4‑bit per‑channel can significantly lower predicted mean opinion scores (UTMOS) and that even 8‑bit per‑tensor scaling can cause severe degradation, with the impact varying by model. A staged ablation identifies the sensitive components, and per‑layer GPTQ can recover performance to within 0.1 UTMOS, while real int8 and int4 kernels confirm the simulated results on hardware, demonstrating that each configuration must be validated on the target runtime.
By Se Un Park, Yutae Kim, Junyoung Park
The paper investigates how post‑training compression techniques—such as pruning, quantization, and distillation—affect demographic fairness in Whisper speech‑recognition models. It finds that pruning and INT4 quantization significantly widen word‑error‑rate gaps between demographic groups, especially for Black/AA and Asian speakers, while distillation tends to reduce these gaps. The study introduces a temporal‑taxation metric to quantify the increased correction effort required for marginalized speakers after compression.
By Srishti Ginjala, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Christopher W. Myers, Srinivasan Parthasarathy
arXiv:2606. 22790v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the tradeoffs between compute allocation and model performance for two speech processing tasks: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Speech Emotion Recognition (SER).
By Vyom Agarwal, Mokshda Gangrade, Siddharth Pal, Jerry Wu
arXiv:2609.13150v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reference-free quality predictors such as UTMOS, DNSMOS and SCOREQ are the de facto automatic evaluators for text-to-speech (TTS) and are increasingl...
By Antonis Asonitis, Juan Pablo Zuluaga Gomez, Francesco Verdini, Aref Farhadipour, Marzieh Razavi, Pierre-Edouard Honnet, Vijeta Avijeet
arXiv:2608. 02235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in neural text-to-speech (TTS) systems have substantially improved speech naturalness and intelligibility across many languages.
By Ali Jafar, Amal Sarmad, Shifa Yousaf, Maryam Bashir
arXiv:2609.15313v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autoregressive generation of interleaved text and acoustic tokens is a common approach to spoken-response generation in speech large language models....
By Daxin Tan, Dehua Tao, Chengxi Deng, Hanlin Zhang, Xiao Chen
arXiv:2609.05871v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Audio-conditioned language models often underuse acoustic cues such as prosody, emotion, and non-speech sounds, raising the question of whether ASR-s...
By Song-ha Jo, Sehyun Lee, Soyoon Kim, Jaesik Choi, Sanghyuk Choi
arXiv:2608.31035v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Codec-based text-to-speech (TTS) models make language-model post-training applicable to speech generation, but it remains unclear when learned perceptu...
By Joonyong Park, Jerry Li
arXiv:2609.18533v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit unequal error rates across speaker groups, motivating interventions on their internal representation...
By Nicolas Bourrel, Abderrahmane Issam, Gerasimos Spanakis
The study investigates how post‑training quantization (PTQ) affects proactive interference (PI) in large language models. Using bitsandbytes, the authors compare FP16, INT8, and INT4/NF4 precision across three instruction‑tuned models and find that INT4 quantization markedly degrades accuracy under high interference, with INT8 also incurring a smaller penalty in two of the three models. The degradation is linked to increased same‑key intrusion errors and originates in the quantized transformer backbone rather than the output layer.
By Shayan Shahrabi-Farahani (Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran), Dara Rahmati (Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran)