The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The paper presents a new evaluation protocol for post‑training quantization of speech language models that separates lexical output, transcript‑insufficient endpoints, and packed implementations. In a Qwen2‑Audio case study, a 6‑bit allocation selected for translation improves chrF scores but degrades emotion recognition, while uniform and front‑layer controls perform better on emotion tasks. Similar patterns hold at 7 bits, and a 4‑bit study shows consistent emotion deficits across all low‑bit allocations, with no advantage for the selected scheme. The study highlights a precision‑dependent mismatch between lexical output, waveform‑dependent behavior, and nominal precision, without claiming a general failure of low‑bit models or a deployment benefit for the selected allocation.
The paper introduces the Speech-Unsupported Rejection Evaluation Challenge (SURE‑Challenge), a benchmark designed to test whether speech‑LLMs should accept or reject audio inputs before generating answers. Using LibriSpeech‑derived transcriptions paired with first‑word question answering, the authors evaluate various noise and silence conditions, and compare a simple energy‑plus‑Whisper‑score rule against a Qwen2‑Audio front‑end. On a 474‑row test set, the rule rejects 196 of 204 unsupported inputs while preserving accuracy on supported data, revealing a pre‑generation error mode that answer‑only scoring misses.
arXiv:2608.27783v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech language models (speech LLMs) can generate plausible outputs from audio that contains no usable speech evidence. We study this failure...
The study evaluates Qwen2‑Audio‑7B‑Instruct quantization at mixed 4/8‑bit settings on English‑to‑German translation and emotion recognition tasks. BLEU and chrF scores relative to FP16 show no significant difference, yet absolute accuracy on RAVDESS drops by 3.71% for 6‑bit and 1.17% for 7‑bit, with the 6‑bit interval statistically significant. The results demonstrate that text‑output metrics alone cannot confirm performance preservation on speech tasks where labels cannot be inferred from transcripts.
arXiv:2609.18533v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems exhibit unequal error rates across speaker groups, motivating interventions on their internal representation...
The paper introduces a reproducible framework that converts existing text-based tool‑calling benchmarks into audio‑based evaluations using text‑to‑speech, speaker variation, and environmental noise, while preserving original annotations. Experiments on seven omni‑modal models show that performance varies strongly by model and task, with notable gaps between text and voice results. The study also includes a stress test, a reference‑free LLM‑as‑judge protocol, and demonstrates that open‑source judges can match proprietary ones, aiding privacy‑preserving evaluation.