arXiv AI
Jul 21
Retain or Consolidate? Budget-Dependent Operator Selection for Language Agent Memory
arXiv:2607. 17545v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language agents depend on memory across interactions.
When Does Overlap Help? OSU-Mem and a Cell-Conditional Analysis of Trajectory Memory for LLM Agents
arXiv:2606. 28376v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents accumulate interaction trajectories that quickly exceed any practical prompt budget, and existing memory methods either truncate aggressively and lose non-local evidence or retain boilerplate that degrades decision quality.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 6
MemSIF: From Structured Interactions to Dual-Track Fact Memory for LLM Agents
arXiv:2608. 01742v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long-term memory is critical for LLM agents operating over long-horizon interactions.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration
The paper introduces AMA, a framework that uses multiple agents—Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher—to manage memory for large language model agents. AMA’s hierarchical memory design dynamically adjusts retrieval granularity to match task complexity, while the Judge and Refresher ensure relevance, consistency, and timely updates. Experiments on long-context benchmarks show AMA outperforms existing baselines and cuts token usage by about 80% compared to full-context approaches.
arXiv AI
Aug 14
Beyond Retrieval: Query-Conditioned Reuse of Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories
arXiv:2608. 12847v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval can identify a past trajectory that may matter, yet it does not specify how an acting agent should use that trajectory after users, entities, constraints, or environment state have changed.
arXiv AI
Jun 16
T-Mem: Memory That Anticipates, Not Archives
arXiv:2606. 15405v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is essential for conversational agents to remain coherent across extended dialogues, follow through on commitments made many sessions earlier, and adapt their behaviour to each user.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14
CoHyDE: Iterative Co-Training of LLM Rewriter & Dense Encoder for Tool Retrieval
CoHyDE is an iterative co‑training framework that jointly trains a dense encoder and an LLM rewriter for tool retrieval from large API catalogs. The encoder is fine‑tuned with InfoNCE on catalog‑style hypothetical descriptions generated by the rewriter, while the rewriter is preference‑aligned via DPO against the encoder’s retrieval scores. On a 10k‑tool subset of ToolBench, three rounds of CoHyDE outperform the best single‑component baseline by 2.5 pp NDCG@5 on standard queries and 6.3 pp on vague queries, with the largest gains on the hardest vague tier.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30
MemDelta: Controlled Baselines and Hidden Confounds in Agent Memory Evaluation
arXiv:2606. 29914v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent memory systems are increasingly evaluated against RAG and full-context baselines, but reported gains often mix changes in the memory method with changes in the language model, embedding model, or retrieval pipeline, making it unclear what is actually being measured.
arXiv AI
Jul 31
IFCMemoryBench: Evaluating Long-Term Memory of LLM-Based Agents in BIM Information Retrieval
arXiv:2607. 26072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is becoming a core capability of LLM-based agents, but existing evaluations largely test conversational recall in open-domain or persona-grounded settings.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Don't Ask the LLM to Track Freshness: A Deterministic Recipe for Memory Conflict Resolution
arXiv:2606. 01435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based memory systems increasingly maintain facts that evolve over time, where a recurring failure is conflict resolution: when a fact has multiple contradictory values, which should the agent return?
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Agent Zero Memory: Provenance-Aware Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents
Agent Zero Memory is a provenance‑aware long‑term memory system for large language model agents that distills user interactions into three parallel memory structures: an episodic timeline, an associative entity‑event knowledge graph, and a semantic, citation‑locked hierarchical documentary memory. Retrieval is performed via an intent gate, source router, and concurrent searches across the three systems, producing integrated, cited answers that exclude fabrication and require evidence the reader has opened. The system achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on LongMemEval (95.60%) and LoCoMo (93.60%) while offering a favorable accuracy‑cost‑latency trade‑off across multiple backbone LLMs.
arXiv AI
Jun 10
Less Context, More Accuracy: A Bi-Temporal Memory Engine for LLM Agents Where a Lean Retrieved Context Beats the Full History
arXiv:2606. 09900v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term memory is the missing layer for LLM agents: across sessions they forget, and the common workaround -- replaying the whole history into the prompt -- is expensive, slow, and, as distractors accumulate, less accurate.