arXiv:2609.35232v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Visual-token compression is effective for improving the efficiency of vision-language models, but under extreme compression budgets, token pr...
By Rui Zhong, Yu Li, Zheyu Yan, Cheng Zhuo
arXiv:2607. 04605v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-vector vision-language retrieval preserves fine-grained visual evidence through maximum-similarity late interaction, but dense image-side tokens make storage and scoring expensive.
By Suhyeong Park, Junha Jung, Jungwoo Park, Jaewoo Kang
The paper introduces Visual Token Coding (VTC), a token compression method for video multimodal large language models that mimics classical video coding by predicting I/P frames and measuring residuals to reduce token redundancy. VTC is extended with dynamic features—Dynamic Resolution Input, Dynamic Token Allocation, and Spatial Coverage Top‑K—forming VTC_Dy, which can be applied to existing MLLMs without additional tuning. Experiments on three MLLMs and multiple video benchmarks show that VTC_Dy retains over 100% of average performance with a 50% token budget and 97.8% with a 25% budget, while the code is publicly available.
By Chenxin Fang, Tao Chen, JunChao You, Jun Peng, Yiyi Zhou, Rongrong Ji
In video understanding, vision-language models (VLMs) must ingest massive numbers of visual tokens, causing the computational and memory cost of the prefill stage to rise sharply. Such visual sequences are highly redundant along the spatio-temporal dimension, yet a high compression ratio is often accompanied by the loss of critical details.
arXiv:2608. 09176v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual token compression for vision--language models (VLMs) has largely relied on criteria such as attention, redundancy, and uncertainty to maximize average accuracy under a fixed compute budget, implicitly assuming that all errors carry equal cost.
By Jingbo Wen, Liang He, Mingyu Cao, Haoyu Wang, Minxuan Hu, Kangning Cui, Xilu Wang
arXiv:2608.23921v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent Vision-Language Models encode high-resolution images into long visual token sequences, incurring prohibitive prefill costs. To compress them, ex...
By Yuanhao Sun, Huawei Ji, Yuan Jin, Cheng Deng, Luoyi Fu, Xinbing Wang
Multi-vector vision-language retrieval preserves fine-grained visual evidence through maximum-similarity late interaction, but dense image-side tokens make storage and scoring expensive. Existing token compression methods reduce this cost, yet they can remove or collapse object- and region-level evidence that future query tokens may need to select.
arXiv:2609.37515v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Thorough evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) has become prohibitively expensive, as benchmarks span an ever-broader spectrum of capabilities...
By Hyunjong Ok, Seunggu Kang, Jaeho Lee
arXiv:2607. 22771v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Picking the frozen image encoder for a 3D~CT vision--language model (VLM), together with the token-compression scheme on top of it, is a search over many candidates.
By Renjie Liang
Vision-language models commonly project all tokens produced by a pretrained vision encoder into a large language model. However, final-layer features can discard text, local attributes, and spatial relationships, while high-resolution inputs substantially increase context length and inference latency.
arXiv:2609.36916v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) incur high inference latency from long visual token sequences. Existing pruning methods commonly use attention...
By Weixuan Li, Zikun Zhou, Xinyi Zhuang, Xinyan Guo, Rui Tian, Chuyao Zhang, Lin Gao
The study investigates how long‑video language models decide which frames to keep, compress, and reuse, testing each decision in isolation across six selection rules, three benchmarks, and two answering models. It finds that selecting frames based on queries yields the biggest performance boost, that halving spatial resolution costs little, and that reallocating saved tokens to more compressed frames can further improve accuracy. The work also highlights the importance of a unified evaluation harness to avoid misleading comparisons.
By Prakhar Khatri