arXiv Computation and Language

Seeing the Unseen: Visual Similarity for Pixel Language Model Adaptation

arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

MIXAR: Scaling Autoregressive Pixel-based Language Models to Multiple Languages and Scripts

MIXAR is the first generative multilingual pixel‑based language model, pretrained on eight high‑resource languages across Latin and CJK scripts with up to 0.5 B parameters. It replaces unstable adversarial training with a GRPO‑based reinforcement‑learning stage, improving free‑generation accuracy by up to 2.3× on multilingual benchmarks. MIXAR generalizes better to unseen low‑resource languages than a tokenizer‑based model trained on the same corpus, matches tokenizer models on discriminative tasks, and resists orthographic attacks more gracefully.

By Chen Hu, Yintao Tai, Antonio Vergari, Frank Keller, Alessandro Suglia
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

What Can Low Resource Languages Learn From Each Other?

The paper examines OCR adaptation for low‑resource languages, noting that fine‑tuning often hits a performance ceiling in data‑scarce settings. It identifies that lower layers of language‑specific models learn redundant features while higher layers capture script nuances, leading to a structural inefficiency. To address this, the authors propose PSMC, a framework that pre‑trains a base model, specializes it per language, merges the experts via task arithmetic, and co‑trains a unified multilingual backbone, achieving about a 2% improvement in Word Recognition Rate across 10 Indian scripts without adding parameters.

By Achyuth P, Kahaan Shah, Chetan Arora
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Not Truly Multilingual: Script Consistency as a Missing Dimension in VLM Evaluation

The paper introduces PuMVR, a benchmark of 1,000 Punjabi image‑text pairs spanning three scripts—Gurmukhi, Shahmukhi, and Roman—to evaluate Vision‑Language Models (VLMs). Testing ten state‑of‑the‑art VLMs reveals a significant Script Gap: models perform well in one script but poorly in another, with accuracy differences up to 16%. The authors propose the Script Consistency Rate (SCR) as a new metric, noting it can be as low as 24.8% on their benchmark, and argue that current multilingual VLMs are not truly multi‑script.

By Prabhjot Singh, Bhushan Pawar, Madhu Reddiboina, Rajvee Sheth
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

ASCIIBench: Evaluating Language-Model-Based Understanding of Visually-Oriented Text

ASCIIBench is a new benchmark that evaluates large language models on generating and classifying ASCII-text images, using a dataset of 5,315 labeled ASCII images. The authors also release a fine‑tuned CLIP model adapted to capture ASCII structure for evaluation. Their analysis shows that cosine similarity on CLIP embeddings fails to separate most categories, indicating a representation bottleneck rather than generational variance.

By Kerry Luo, Michael Fu, Joshua Peguero, Husnain Malik, Anvay Patil, Joyce Lin, Megan Van Overborg, Ryan Sarmiento, Kevin Zhu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

VFA: Empowering Multilingual MLLMs via Vision-Free Adaptation

The paper introduces Vision-Free Adaptation (VFA), a method that separates multilingual language enhancement from visual alignment in multimodal large language models. VFA fine‑tunes a base LLM on multilingual text to create a multilingual task vector, which is then merged with the vision‑aligned task vector of an existing MLLM. Experiments on five MLLMs and six multilingual benchmarks show consistent gains while preserving multimodal and text‑only performance, and using less than 2% of text data narrows the performance gap to fully multimodal‑trained models.

By Yixia Li, Yaqing Shi, Zhiwen Ruan, Dongdong Zhang, Lingjie Jiang, Shaohan Huang, Yun Chen, Guanhua Chen, Furu Wei
arXiv AI
Oct 2

LensVLM: Selective Context Expansion for Compressed Visual Representation of Text

LensVLM is an inference framework and post‑training recipe that lets Vision‑Language Models (VLMs) process compressed images of text by selectively expanding only the relevant parts back to full resolution. Using Qwen3.5‑9B‑Base, LensVLM achieves accuracy comparable to full‑text models at 4.3× compression and outperforms other compression baselines up to 10.1× across seven text QA benchmarks, while also improving performance on multimodal document and code tasks as compression increases.

By Roy Xie, Dan Friedman, Donghan Yu, Bowen Pan, Christopher Fifty, Jang-Hyun Kim, Xianzhi Du, Zhe Gan, Vivek Rathod, Bhuwan Dhingra