arXiv AI

Scale-Invariant Training for Time Series Foundation Models

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Practical Scaling Laws: Converting Compute into Performance in a Data-Constrained World

The paper introduces a new closed‑form scaling law that extends Chinchilla’s original formula to handle data‑constrained regimes. It decomposes loss into undercapacity, undertraining, and overfitting components, saturating between an irreducible loss and an uninformed baseline. The authors validate the model on diverse architectures and domains, achieving state‑of‑the‑art RMSE across multiple LLM scaling‑law grids and enabling cost‑aware training allocations.

By Christopher M. Bryant, Hao Liu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 31

Negligible in Size, Significant in Effect: On Scale Vectors in Large Language Models

The paper investigates the often-overlooked scale vectors in large language models, showing that despite their tiny size they are crucial for pre‑training performance. The authors provide theoretical insights that scale vectors mainly aid optimization rather than expressivity, and they analyze how weight decay affects different normalization layers. Building on these findings, they propose lightweight improvements—branch‑specific heterogeneity, better placement, and magnitude‑direction reparameterization—that consistently reduce loss across a range of model sizes and training settings.

By Mingze Wang, Shuchen Zhu, Yuxin Fang, Binghui Li, Kai Shen, Shu Zhong
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

Foundations of the Scaling Law

arXiv:2610.27789v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Empirical scaling laws relate validation loss to model size, training exposure and compute, providing a quantitative basis for allocating resources. Th...

By Tianyu Zhao, Zhixiang Ren
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Coupled Scaling: A Representational Accessibility Framework for Neural Scaling Laws

The paper introduces Coupled Scaling, a framework that links neural scaling laws to the relationship between task structure and the geometry that an architecture‑optimization system can access. It shows that finite‑budget scaling depends on how well the system’s representational support aligns with the task’s energy distribution, deriving residual exponents that vary with architectural coverage and tail decay. The authors propose tests to verify whether static task‑relevant geometry tracks loss and whether multiscale geometry follows coupling‑specific exponent ordering, suggesting a factorial audit of emergence trajectories to isolate geometry from scaling fits.

By Jie Wang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

How Good Can Linear Models Be for Time-Series Forecasting?

Time-series forecasting research has been moving steadily toward larger architectures, from specialized transformers to general-purpose foundation models, on the assumption that capacity is what unlocks accuracy. We take the opposite position: most of the gap can be closed at far lower cost by tuning preprocessing rather than scaling models.