arXiv:2608. 20638v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The edge-of-stability (EoS) phenomenon of Adam has been widely observed, while its underlying dynamical mechanism is not yet fully understood.
By Yiman Fong, Heng Yang
arXiv:2604. 08742v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adam is widely used, but its convergence theory remains incomplete even in the deterministic full-batch setting because momentum and adaptive preconditioning are tightly coupled.
By Yaxin Yu, Long Chen, Zeyi Xu
The paper investigates how Adam’s update rule relates to natural gradient descent (NGD) by treating Adam as a diagonal empirical Fisher approximation with additional factors such as diagonal truncation, empirical label substitution, and temporal lag. Using a scale‑invariant metric, the authors quantify Adam’s geometric deviation from true NGD across four loss landscapes—well‑conditioned and ill‑conditioned linear regression, logistic regression, and a small neural network—finding that deviation is low in well‑conditioned settings but can reach about 10³ in ill‑conditioned or non‑convex scenarios. Despite higher geometric drift correlating with slower early optimization, Adam still achieves low final loss, and the improved empirical Fisher (iEF) yields more stable trajectories than the standard empirical Fisher (EF).
By Vihaan Paka-Hegde
arXiv:2505. 13196v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Velocity-Regularized Adam (VRAdam), a physics-inspired optimizer for training deep neural networks that draws on ideas from quartic terms for kinetic energy with its stabilizing effects on various system dynamics.
By Pranav Vaidhyanathan, Lucas Schorling, Natalia Ares, Maike Osborne
arXiv:2606. 15551v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Edge of Stability (EoS) phenomenon, where gradient descent operates with sharpness exceeding the classical convergence threshold yet the loss decreases over long timescales, is ubiquitous in modern deep learning but remains poorly understood in realistic settings.
By Eric Gan
arXiv:2606. 18080v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gradient descent in deep learning may operate at the edge of stability (EoS), a regime in which the largest eigenvalue of the loss Hessian hovers near the stability threshold $2/\eta$, where $\eta$ is the learning rate.
By Pierre Marion
arXiv:2605. 29547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators.
By Ruoran Xu, Borong She, Xiaobo Jin, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv:2602. 00334v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Momentum Stochastic Gradient Descent (mSGD) relies on a fixed momentum coefficient shared across all parameters, failing to account for the heterogeneous structure of modern loss landscapes.
By Aikaterini Karoni, Rajit Rajpal, Benedict Leimkuhler, Gabriel Stoltz
The paper investigates why setting the two momentum parameters of Adam equal (β1=β2) has a special dynamic effect. By analysing Adam in continuous time, the authors show that the update decomposes into a sign component, a magnitude‑lag term proportional to the difference between the two memory times, and other terms. This lag term disappears exactly when β1=β2, making the diagonal the only regime where the mismatch‑induced response is structurally absent. Experiments on six vision and language tasks confirm that tied configurations are sign‑dominated, have smaller lag contributions, and exhibit smoother update‑norm trajectories.
By Alberto Fern\'andez-Hern\'andez, Cristian P\'erez-Corral, Jose I. Mestre, Manuel F. Dolz, Enrique S. Quintana-Ort\'i
arXiv:2606. 30226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hessian spectral properties are a standard tool in analysing neural-network training, with eigenvalues linked to sharpness, generalization, and optimization dynamics.
By Marcelina Marjankowska, Valerio Modugno, Paolo Barucca
The paper studies how Adam’s two momentum timescales, β1 and β3, influence loss spikes during neural‑network training. By mapping training dynamics across the (β1,β3) plane, the authors find an approximately linear boundary, 1-β3 = C(1-β1), that separates spiky from non‑spiky behavior, with the coefficient C linked to the effective loss exponent in superquadratic loss functions. They also show that confident cross‑entropy losses create a core–wall landscape that behaves superquadratically at the scale of an optimizer update, explaining the observed spikes.
By Gaoxiang Tang, Huanran Chen, Ziming Liu
arXiv:2607. 03998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The local sharpness of the loss, the top Hessian eigenvalue $\lambda_1$, determines the largest stable gradient step, but measuring it normally requires Lanczos or Hessian-vector iterations.
By Ashmitha R, J\"org Frochte