arXiv:2505. 13196v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Velocity-Regularized Adam (VRAdam), a physics-inspired optimizer for training deep neural networks that draws on ideas from quartic terms for kinetic energy with its stabilizing effects on various system dynamics.
By Pranav Vaidhyanathan, Lucas Schorling, Natalia Ares, Maike Osborne
arXiv:2604. 08742v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adam is widely used, but its convergence theory remains incomplete even in the deterministic full-batch setting because momentum and adaptive preconditioning are tightly coupled.
By Yaxin Yu, Long Chen, Zeyi Xu
arXiv:2602. 10204v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce MVN-Grad (Momentum on Variance-Normalized Gradients), an Adam-style optimizer that improves stability and performance by combining two complementary ideas: variance-based normalization and momentum applied after normalization.
By Francisco Patitucci, Aryan Mokhtari
arXiv:2605. 29547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators.
By Ruoran Xu, Borong She, Xiaobo Jin, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv:2301. 06308v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) is a training method that seeks to find flat minima in deep learning, resulting in state-of-the-art performance across various domains.
By Hoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi, Jaewook Lee
The paper investigates how Adam’s update rule relates to natural gradient descent (NGD) by treating Adam as a diagonal empirical Fisher approximation with additional factors such as diagonal truncation, empirical label substitution, and temporal lag. Using a scale‑invariant metric, the authors quantify Adam’s geometric deviation from true NGD across four loss landscapes—well‑conditioned and ill‑conditioned linear regression, logistic regression, and a small neural network—finding that deviation is low in well‑conditioned settings but can reach about 10³ in ill‑conditioned or non‑convex scenarios. Despite higher geometric drift correlating with slower early optimization, Adam still achieves low final loss, and the improved empirical Fisher (iEF) yields more stable trajectories than the standard empirical Fisher (EF).
By Vihaan Paka-Hegde