arXiv:2606. 00570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-based knowledge editing updates the internal knowledge of large language models (LLMs) via localized weight modifications and has attracted significant attention.
By Wanying Ren, Xin Song, Futing Wang, Guoxiu He, Aixin Sun
The paper introduces GLIME, a lifelong model editing framework that integrates knowledge editing with preference optimization to handle continual updates in large language models. GLIME employs replay-based editing and a gradient constraint to prevent overfitting to target prompts and preserve previously edited knowledge. Experiments demonstrate that GLIME enhances knowledge generalization while maintaining editing performance and overall model capabilities.
By Dahyun Jung, Suhyune Son, Heuiseok Lim
arXiv:2603.12677v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Existing locate-then-edit Knowledge Editing (KE) methods typically decompose editing into two stages: upstream target representation optimiza...
By Shuxin Liu, Di Gao, Ou Wu
arXiv:2605. 11836v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Lifelong Model Editing aims to continuously update evolving facts in Large Language Models while preserving unrelated knowledge and general capabilities, yet it remains plagued by catastrophic forgetting and model collapse.
By Xin Ma, Wei Chen, Qi Liu, Derong Xu, Zhi Zheng, Tong Xu, Enhong Chen
The paper introduces ALOE, a method for knowledge editing that learns semantic addresses from paraphrases and hard negatives, aligns them with autoregressive hidden states, and embeds a gated low‑rank operator within a single MLP layer. This design allows the edited model to run in one forward pass without external retrievers or routers. Experiments on CounterFact, ZSRE, and KnowEdit show high efficacy (0.955–0.999) and locality (0.981–1.000) across 7–8B model families, with analyses indicating effective separation of edits and suppression of out‑of‑scope activation.
By Zeyan Li, Hu Xu, Jianfeng Xu
arXiv:2602.20207v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Knowledge editing in Large Language Models (LLMs) aims to update the model's prediction for a specific query to a desired target while preser...
By Shrestha Datta, Hongfu Liu, Anshuman Chhabra
arXiv:2606. 19679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lifelong knowledge editing aims to efficiently and sequentially update language models over time, as new knowledge becomes available or when the model makes mistakes, while preserving acceptable performance on past knowledge.
By Masih Eskandar, Miquel Sirera Perell\'o, Stratis Ioannidis, Jennifer Dy
The paper introduces FOVEATED, a plug‑and‑play framework that improves atomic‑fact recall in unstructured knowledge editing (UKE) for large language models. By randomly shifting Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) positions during editing, FOVEATED creates focused views of each sentence, counteracting the context‑reliance problem where edited LLMs reproduce passages but fail to recall individual facts. Experiments show consistent gains across five editors, two LLM backbones, and three benchmarks.
By Ding Wu, Ye Zhang, Haoyu Wang, Tianci Liu
arXiv:2607. 20433v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While language models remain frozen at their training state, the world evolves continuously.
By Jea Kwon, Jiwon Kim, Dong-kyum Kim, Meeyoung Cha
arXiv:2511. 05852v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Knowledge editing (KE) offers a lightweight alternative to retraining for updating large language models (LLMs).
By Yinjie Cheng, Paul Youssef, Christin Seifert, J\"org Schl\"otterer, Zhixue Zhao
arXiv:2511. 20892v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce incorrect or outdated content after being employed.
By Xuyuan Liu, Shengyu Chen, Xinshuai Dong, Yanchi Liu, Xujiang Zhao, Haoyu Wang, Yujun Yan, Haifeng Chen, Zhengzhang Chen
DynEdit is a dynamic framework for editing long-sequence knowledge in large language models. It uses token-level entropy to guide non-uniform sliding windows, focusing on high-entropy, information-dense regions that are harder to edit. Experiments on three benchmarks and two backbone models show DynEdit outperforms baselines, achieving up to +14.0 BLEU points on challenging paraphrase queries and near-saturated semantic scores across diverse knowledge domains.
By Jinhu Fu, Yan Bai, Yihang Lou, Li Sun, Jiahong Wu, Xiangxiang Chu, Sen Su