arXiv:2606. 15115v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-objective optimization (MOO) has emerged as a powerful approach to solving complex optimization problems involving multiple objectives.
By Yiyi Zhu, Yaolin Wen, Xiang Xia, Xin An, Hanyi Si, Xiang Shu, Yangde Fu, Liang Dou, Hong Qian
arXiv:2602. 07764v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) seeks to train agents capable of balancing conflicting objectives.
By Tanmay Ambadkar, Sourav Panda, Shreyash Kale, Jonathan Dodge, Abhinav Verma
arXiv:2606. 26397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world decision-making often requires balancing multiple conflicting objectives, a challenge that standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) frequently addresses by aggregating rewards into a single scalar signal.
By Aniruddha Joshi, Niklas Lauffer, Sanjit Seshia
arXiv:2606. 03904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\cite{kingma2015adam}.
By Fengbei Liu, Rachit Saluja, Sunwoo Kwak, Ruibo Wang, Ruining Deng, Heejong Kim, Johannes C. Paetzold, Mert R. Sabuncu
arXiv:2605. 01712v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Pareto set learning (PSL) is an emerging paradigm in multi-objective optimization that trains neural networks to map preference vectors to Pareto optimal solutions.
By Xinyue Chen, Yingxuan Liang, Yiqin Huang, Chikai Shang, Hai-Lin Liu, Fangqing Gu
arXiv:2606. 24042v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recommender systems often induce filter bubbles and semantic homogenization by monolithically optimizing for immediate user engagement.
By Cl\'audio L\'ucio Do Val Lopes, Lucca Machado da Silva, Andr\'e de Oliveira Brand\~ao
arXiv:2506. 21887v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: High-stakes decision-making involves navigating multiple competing objectives with expensive evaluations.
By Edward Chen, Sang T. Truong, Natalie Dullerud, Sanmi Koyejo, Carlos Guestrin
arXiv:2601. 20753v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Preference-Conditioned Policy Learning (PCPL) in Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) approximates diverse Pareto-optimal solutions by conditioning a single policy on user-specified preferences, enabling run-time adaptation to arbitrary trade-offs without retraining.
By Zhiheng Jiang, Yunzhe Wang, Ryan Marr, Ellen Novoseller, Benjamin T. Files, Volkan Ustun
arXiv:2602. 03901v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The pursuit of optimal trade-offs in high-dimensional search spaces under stringent computational constraints poses a fundamental challenge for contemporary multi-objective optimization.
By Rong Fu, Chunlei Meng, Haoyu Zhao, Kun Liu, JiaBao Dou, Youjin Wang, Simon James Fong
arXiv:2606. 04468v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline multi-objective optimization (Offline MOO) aims to discover novel Pareto-optimal designs based on static datasets without expensive environment interactions.
By Ruiqing Sun, Sen Yang, Dawei Feng, Bo Ding, Yijie Wang, Huaimin Wang
arXiv:2607. 29559v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems are typically trained using a single, well-specified scalar reward function.
By Manith Adikari, Bei Peng, Samuele Vinanzi, Angelo Cangelosi
Recommender systems often induce filter bubbles and semantic homogenization by monolithically optimizing for immediate user engagement. Standard single-objective models, including traditional Deep Q-Networks, are ill-equipped to navigate the trade-offs between platform retention and critical societal values like information diversity and provider fairness.