Entity-Memory graph retrieval preserves dialogue turns as verbatim memory nodes, links repeated mentions via shared entities, and connects adjacent memories with chronological edges. During retrieval, the system gates through entities, fuses semantics, and performs one‑hop chronological recovery before dense backfill, allowing it to keep neighboring memories that dense cosine ranking might miss. On 1,986 questions from ten LoCoMo conversations, this graph retrieval method increases official evidence recall at top‑k 25 from 79.7468 % to 84.4842 %, with the advantage extending from top‑k 5 to 50, though it does not improve overall final‑answer F1.
By Shumao Sun
arXiv:2609.22100v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves language models with retrieved evidence, but processing many long passages is costly and can introduce...
By Artem Sakhno, Grigorii Davydenko, Omar Zoloev, Julia Belikova, Andrey Savchenko, Maksim Makarenko
arXiv:2608.22767v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term language-model agents accumulate memories across interactions, but their retrievers typically do not accumulate retrieval experience. Semanti...
By Qi Feng, Chris Ding, Jicong Fan
arXiv:2607. 00017v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term conversational agents are expected to remember past interactions, but memory is useful only when the right evidence is recalled for the right user.
By ZhiShu Jiang, Haibo Liu, Xin Shen, Guanqiang QI, Chenxi Miao, Weikang Li, Liwei Qian, Xin Pei, Jizhou Huang
arXiv:2609.07093v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to answer questions by accessing external knowledge and has been widely a...
By Yifan Wang, Xinkui Lin, Yongxiu Xu, Shen Gao, Ruochen Yang, Kun Huang, Yubin Wang, Jie Wu, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Hongbo Xu, Shuo Shang
The paper introduces the AutoRegressive Retriever (ARR), a multimodal retrieval model that iteratively refines a query embedding by selecting informative items and incorporating their content. ARR alternates between retrieval and query update, using stepwise contrastive supervision and reinforcement learning to optimize item selection and final ranking. Experiments show ARR outperforms baselines on in‑domain and zero‑shot benchmarks, with feedback improving both inference performance and initial query embeddings.
By Jianfei Zhao, Yifan Wang, Feng Zhang, Xin Sun, Chong Feng, Zhixing Tan, Yang Luo, Boyuan Pan, Xu Kai, Yao Hu
arXiv:2610.07731v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Dense retrieval models are typically trained with contrastive objectives that learn effective representations but do not directly optimize retrieval...
By Qi Liu, Fengming Liang, Yiqun Chen, Erhan Zhang, Jiaxin Mao
The paper introduces REVA, a method for compressing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) prompts by aggregating historical query–document–model interactions into reusable evidence views. REVA mines attention traces from the target generator, maps token-level attention to readable words, aggregates importance across repeated document accesses, and produces budget‑specific plain‑text views that maintain document order and the standard RAG interface. Experiments on four benchmarks with modern LLMs show that REVA improves generation quality by 1.0–5.8 points over existing compressors while reducing compression overhead by 5.3 to 15.6 times and adding less than 40 ms of latency.
By Tuan Nguyen, Qiran Hu, Banruo Liu, Khoa D. Doan, Kok-Seng Wong, Fan Lai
The paper introduces DEPT, a method that trains a single decoder-only large language model to both expand queries and encode documents for retrieval. By preserving document embeddings close to their initial cached values while allowing gradients to flow through the generator, DEPT stabilizes retrieval targets and enables efficient index reuse and online hard‑negative mining. Experiments on the BEIR benchmark with Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507 and LLaMA‑3.2‑3B‑Instruct show that DEPT outperforms training‑free, independently trained, and staged unified baselines, with ablations confirming the benefits of preservation, whitening, end‑to‑end expansion training, and online negatives.
By Jingyuan Wang, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Mingxin Li, Yanzhao Zhang
The paper introduces Efficient Retrieval Adapter (ERA), a query‑side adapter framework that enables dense retrieval systems to adapt to asymmetric query–document scenarios without re‑indexing. ERA first aligns the embedding spaces of a powerful query embedder and a lightweight document embedder using unlabeled documents, then fine‑tunes the aligned query representation with a small set of labeled query‑document pairs. In experiments on 126 MAIR retrieval tasks across six domains, ERA boosts average nDCG@10 by up to 8.2 points in symmetric settings and over 12 points in asymmetric settings while requiring far fewer labels than fully supervised adapter training.
By Seiji Maekawa, Moin Aminnaseri, Pouya Pezeshkpour, Estevam Hruschka
The paper introduces INTRA, an attention-based encoder-decoder framework that retrieves directly from its own internal representations instead of using an external retriever. By having decoder attention query pre-encoded evidence chunks, INTRA unifies retrieval and generation, eliminating the typical mismatch seen in retrieval-augmented generation pipelines. Experiments on question-answering benchmarks show that INTRA outperforms strong engineered retrieval pipelines in both evidence recall and overall answer quality.
By Elad Hoffer, Yochai Blau, Edan Kinderman, Ron Banner, Daniel Soudry, Boris Ginsburg
The paper introduces TriMEM, a multi‑class memory dataset that annotates memory types across varied scenarios, and MemoType, a framework that uses a learned router to adaptively match memories and queries to appropriate retrieval strategies. MemoType’s tailored approach improves retrieval precision, and the authors theoretically show that a single strategy has a fundamental upper bound on expected precision in multi‑class corpora. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate MemoType consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving up to a 16.18% improvement in Recall@1.
By Yi Wen, Derong Xu, Pengyue Jia, Yichao Wang, Yingyi Zhang, Maolin Wang, Junyi Li, Wenlin Zhang, Xiaopeng Li, Yong Liu, Xiangyu Zhao