← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Yi Wen, Derong Xu, Pengyue Jia, Yichao Wang, Yingyi Zhang, Maolin Wang, Junyi Li, Wenlin Zhang, Xiaopeng Li, Yong Liu, Xiangyu Zhao

Memory Type Varies: Empowering LLM Agents for Long-Term Memory with Diverse Strategies

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces TriMEM, a multi‑class memory dataset that annotates memory types across varied scenarios, and MemoType, a framework that uses a learned router to adaptively match memories and queries to appropriate retrieval strategies. MemoType’s tailored approach improves retrieval precision, and the authors theoretically show that a single strategy has a fundamental upper bound on expected precision in multi‑class corpora. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate MemoType consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving up to a 16.18% improvement in Recall@1.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Jul 16

Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents

arXiv:2607. 13591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.

By Eric Hanchen Jiang, Zhi Zhang, Yuchen Wu, Levina Li, Dong Liu, Xiao Liang, Rui Sun, Yubei Li, Edward Sun, Haozheng Luo, Zhaolu Kang, Aylin Caliskan, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu
llmsagentsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Oct 5

DyadMem: A Long-Term Memory Benchmark of How Agents Work with Users

DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.

By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions

arXiv:2507. 05257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks.

By Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuley
llmsragagentsbenchmarks
More like this →