arXiv Computer Vision

Video-HopChain: Multi-Hop Questions and Confidence-Gated Exploration for Video Reasoning Models

Video-HopChain introduces a new dataset of 22,550 multi‑hop video questions over 13,378 videos, each question consisting of three to six yes/no sub‑questions whose integer answers sum to a verifiable reward. Training a Qwen3‑VL‑8B model with GRPO on this dataset improves performance across eight video‑understanding benchmarks from 55.4 to 57.9, and the addition of Confidence‑Gated Exploration (CGE) raises the mean to 59.3. The authors release the dataset, checkpoint, and training code for further research.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7

Incentivizing Vision Language Models to Search for Long Video Question Answering

arXiv:2607. 02959v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce VSeek, an agentic framework that transforms long-video question answering (LVQA) from a passive, single-pass perception task into a multi-turn retrieval process.

By Harsh Goel, S P Sharan, Sahil Shah, Minkyu Choi, Joungbin An, Kristen Grauman, Sandeep P. Chinchali
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 24

Annotations as Rollouts: Efficient and Scalable Reinforcement Learning for Video MLLMs

The paper introduces OraRL, a reinforcement learning framework that leverages annotations as oracle rollouts to improve sample efficiency and scalability for video multimodal large language models (MLLMs). By decoupling advantage estimation and employing sign‑balanced pruning, OraRL achieves faster training and better performance across multiple video‑perception benchmarks compared to existing methods. The approach scales from 0.8B to 9B parameters and handles up to 100k prompts, delivering significant gains in temporal mIoU, tracking accuracy, segmentation, and spatial‑intelligence metrics.

By Yunheng Li, Guohong Mu, Hao Li, Shengsheng Qian, Dingwen Zhang, Qibin Hou, Ming-Ming Cheng
arXiv AI
Jun 24

video-SALMONN-R$^3$: Learning to ReWatch, ReAsk, and ReAnswer for Efficient Video Understanding

arXiv:2606. 24477v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video large language models (LLMs) are often constrained by computation and memory budgets, leading them to use reduced frame rates and spatial resolutions, which may cause them to miss critical information for question answering (QA).

By Yixuan Li, Guangzhi Sun, Yudong Yang, Wei Li, Zejun MA, Chao Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Video Reasoning without Training

arXiv:2510. 17045v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Video reasoning using Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) relies on costly reinforcement learning (RL) and verbose chain-of-thought, resulting in substantial computational overhead during both training and inference.

By Deepak Sridhar, Kartikeya Bhardwaj, Jeya Pradha Jeyaraj, Nuno Vasconcelos, Ankita Nayak, Harris Teague
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

From Evaluation to Enhancement: Benchmarking and Improving Think-with-Video Reasoning for Video Generative Models

The paper introduces VWG-Bench, a benchmark covering nine reasoning dimensions and 38 tasks to evaluate video generative models on symbolic reasoning, physical laws, and goal pursuit. It also presents Vid-PRE, a prompt-rewriting framework that offloads reasoning to a VLM, improving logical performance without changing the generator architecture. Experiments show that current models excel at visual quality but struggle with logic-heavy tasks, while Vid-PRE significantly boosts reasoning across multiple generators.

By Meng Luo, Yicheng Liu, Jiahao Wang, Yuanxing Zhang, Xin Tao, Pengfei Wan, Kun Gai, Hao Fei
arXiv AI
6d ago

Stepwise Intrinsic Rewards for Reasoning in Large Language Models

The paper introduces Stepwise Marginal Information Gain (MIG), an intrinsic process reward that evaluates how each reasoning step of a large language model (LLM) or vision-language model (VLM) improves the likelihood of the reference answer. MIG rewards only new likelihood maxima, preventing duplicate credit, and is combined with outcome, format, and self‑distillation objectives to guide training. Experiments on eight benchmarks show that this method outperforms outcome‑only reinforcement learning and improves accuracy by up to 4.8 points over binary‑reward training, including a 12.6‑point gain on MathVerse and a 12.9‑point advantage on vision‑language transfer at 7B parameters.

By Xiangwei Wang, Wei Wang, Ken Chen, Nanduni Nimalsiri, Sachith Seneviratne, Saman Halgamuge