Hugging Face Trending Papers

How Much Evidence Should a Coding Agent's Self-Correction Carry? Adaptive Dirichlet Evidence for Self-Distillation

arXiv AI
Aug 26

When Can One Neuron Fix Repetition Loops in LLMs?

The paper investigates whether targeted edits to a few internal components of Gemma 4 instruction‑tuned models can reduce persistent repetition loops that occur during long factual enumeration prompts. By combining per‑layer ablation with per‑neuron attribution, the authors identify specific neurons whose weight edits dramatically lower loop frequency—one sign‑inverted neuron suffices for Gemma 4 E2B. Across all four Gemma variants, loop occurrences drop from 46/384 to 12/384 on held‑out prompts, while general‑purpose benchmarks show no significant regressions. The study also demonstrates that similar sparse edits can mitigate repetition in other families such as Qwen3.5 and LFM2.5, though the effect varies.

By Aristotelis Lazaridis, Aman Sharma, Dylan Bates, Brian King, Vincent Lu, Jack FitzGerald
arXiv AI
Aug 6

Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Observation-Calibrated Self-Distillation

arXiv:2608. 04788v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents are commonly trained through reinforcement learning with sparse trajectory-level rewards, which offer limited guidance on how strongly individual tokens should be updated.

By Yi Yang, Cong Qin, Xiaodan Liu, Chishui Chen, Qing Dong, Yan Zhang, Cao Liu, Zhao Yang, Lu Pan, Jiaye Lin, Yi Feng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 5

Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Observation-Calibrated Self-Distillation

Large language model agents are commonly trained through reinforcement learning with sparse trajectory-level rewards, which offer limited guidance on how strongly individual tokens should be updated. On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) addresses this by re-scoring generated tokens under a privileged replay view to obtain dense, token-level supervision.

arXiv AI
Oct 9

Prior or Feedback? What an LLM Uses When Adapting Neural Operators

The study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) rely solely on their initial task context or adapt based on experimental feedback when selecting fine‑tuning configurations for neural operators. Experiments across partial differential equation families show that LLMs outperform random search and Bayesian optimisation, with early configurations already near the top of a random‑search pool and subsequent proposals changing in response to validation scores. Controlled interventions confirm that the LLM combines a task‑dependent prior with sensitivity to observed outcomes.

By Julian Chan, Javier Mora Jimenez
arXiv AI
Sep 16

ReDraft, Don't Just Distill: Reference-Driven Revision for Continual VLLM Post-Training

ReDraft is a reference‑driven revision method for continual post‑training of large multimodal language models. It uses the model’s own incorrect outputs as references, revises them, verifies the revisions, and fine‑tunes on the accepted ones, thereby combining explicit supervision with policy proximity. On tasks such as Counting, Clock Reading, and Jigsaw, ReDraft outperforms standard supervised fine‑tuning and on‑policy methods, achieving higher target‑task gains while dramatically reducing forgetting.

By Zhihao Zhang, Mingqi Wu, Qiaole Dong, Enyu Zhou, Shuo Li, Boyang Liu, Jiazheng Zhang, Honglin Guo, Xin Guo, Shaofan Liu, Junzhe Wang, Dingwei Zhu, Zhiheng Xi, Minlong Peng, Yuan Hua, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Learning from Revision Consequences: Hindsight Meta-Experience Distillation for Self-Improving Agents

The paper introduces Hindsight Meta-Experience Distillation (HMED), a method that lets self‑improving agents evaluate how revisions to their Meta‑Skills affect skill discovery by re‑executing both the original and revised Meta‑Skills from the same initial state. By comparing these outcomes, HMED creates structured Meta‑Experiences that provide learning signals even for revisions that are not ultimately kept. Experiments on three interactive benchmarks show that HMED consistently outperforms strong baselines, improving skill discovery by focusing on the consequences of the improvement process rather than just branch outcomes.

By Qianhan Feng, Zhongzhen Huang, Yakun Zhu, Xiaofan Zhang, Qi Dou