arXiv:2609.38142v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A small trainable advisor can steer a frozen language-model executor using natural-language advice. In addition to learning from task rewards, the advi...
By Rishabh Agrawal, Hejie Cui, Shasha Li, Shanchan Wu, Sercan \"{O}. Ar{\i}k
arXiv:2606. 25449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A language model's memory can be worse than having no memory at all.
By Alex Kwon
A language model's memory can be worse than having no memory at all. Give a model a memory that kept a wrong conclusion but dropped the work behind it, and it emits that stale value as a confident answer; give the same model an empty memory and it abstains.
arXiv:2607. 15587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual learning studies how deployed language models can continually acquire new tasks without expensive retraining from scratch.
By Yang Meng, Zhenya Liu, Zhuokai Zhao, Yuxin Chen
The paper identifies a specific issue in supervised fine‑tuning (SFT) of large language models called factual access failure, where models can recognize correct facts under constrained tests but fail to generate them in open‑ended settings. It demonstrates that SFT can cause both genuine wrong answers and expression‑level errors such as verbosity or formatting mismatches. To mitigate this, the authors propose Recall‑Anchored Distillation (RAD), a self‑distillation method that aligns the fine‑tuned model with the base model’s soft output distribution on unlabeled out‑of‑distribution text, thereby recovering lost factual recall without needing labeled data.
By Haodong Chen, Yadong Wang, Shengtao Wen, Dong Liang, Xiang Chen
arXiv:2609.36375v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Continual learning is usually studied through mechanisms that preserve old knowledge. We develop Successional Learning Theory (SLT), a mesoscopic accou...
By Shoaib Ahmed Dipu, Md Salman Shamil, Sayeed Shafayet Chowdhury
arXiv:2604. 21927v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Continual learning (CL) studies how models acquire tasks sequentially while retaining previously learned knowledge.
By Paul-Tiberiu Iordache, Elena Burceanu
arXiv:2609.35954v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model post-training generates self-generated rollouts through reinforcement learning and on-policy distillation, yet this experience i...
By Zhiwei Zhang, Huayu Deng, Fei Zhao, Jiayan Fu, Bin Liang, Kam-Fai Wong, Mu Chuan
arXiv:2608.20873v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Every way of teaching a deployed language model something new -- full fine-tuning, adapter merging, model editing -- replaces the released checkpoint,...
By Zifeng Liu, Zhiyong Du, Yaxin Lu, Yiming Mao, Zhenhe Wang, Wenqi Shi, Zhengkun Jing
arXiv:2606. 00147v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Domain-specific supervised fine-tuning (SFT) often improves in-domain performance at the cost of degrading a model's general capabilities.
By Yuduo Li, Xiaofeng Shi, Qian Kou, Longbin Yu, Hua Zhou
Draft-OPD introduces an on‑policy distillation method for speculative draft models, addressing the mismatch between supervised fine‑tuning and inference by letting the target model supervise the drafter on draft‑induced states. The approach uses target‑assisted rollouts for stable continuations and replays drafting from error positions exposed during verification, enabling the drafter to learn from both accepted and rejected proposals. Experiments demonstrate that Draft‑OPD achieves more than five‑fold lossless acceleration across diverse tasks, outperforming prior draft models such as EAGLE‑3 and DFlash by 23 % and 13 % respectively.
By Haodi Lei, Yafu Li, Haoran Zhang, Shunkai Zhang, Qianjia Cheng, Xiaoye Qu, Ganqu Cui, Bowen Zhou, Ning Ding, Yun Luo, Yu Cheng
PROOF-Gen is a method that improves distillation of tool‑calling models by recovering successful trajectories from teacher failures. It uses per‑scenario prompt optimization to generate corrective guidance that steers the teacher to a passing trajectory, then removes this guidance before training so the student learns from clean demonstrations. On τ2‑bench, PROOF-Gen recovers 93% of failed scenarios, boosting Qwen3‑4B‑Instruct‑2507’s Pass^1 from 0.132 to 0.529 and improving Gemma 4 E4B‑it by 7.2pp on BFCL v4 multi‑turn, while also raising deployed on‑device model performance by up to 5.0pp across response‑quality metrics.
By Anh Ta, Junjie Zhu, Shahin Shayandeh