Loop, Think, & Generalize: Implicit Reasoning in Recurrent-Depth Transformers
arXiv:2604. 07822v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study implicit reasoning, i.
arXiv:2604. 07822v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study implicit reasoning, i.
The paper argues that pattern recognition and step‑by‑step reasoning lie on a spectrum, with large language models (LLMs) learning the latter when the next token depends on only a few preceding tokens. It formalises reasoning traces as paths on a De Bruijn graph, showing that the number of edges is far smaller than the number of possible traces, making step‑by‑step reasoning sample‑efficient. Experiments fine‑tuning Qwen2.5‑1.5B‑Instruct demonstrate that a moderate density of states balances accuracy and robustness, and that real‑world models like Qwen3 retain most of their performance even when attention is limited to a small sliding window.
arXiv:2609.00002v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models enable language-model agents to predict environment dynamics and plan before acting. In text environments, the model must learn symbolic a...
arXiv:2609.39967v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recursive reasoning models apply a small shared Transformer block many times to refine a latent state. This gives them large effective depth with few...
Tiny Recursive Message Passing applies recursive transformers and deep supervision to message passing neural networks, achieving high efficiency. The approach yields about 99% test accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme with only 16k parameters, training quickly on modern GPUs or CPUs. It also demonstrates zero‑shot transfer to larger problem instances, outperforming popular neural baselines on N‑queens and Boolean satisfiability with fewer parameters.
arXiv:2609.33149v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A common principle of effective learning is to practice material that is neither already mastered nor too difficult to permit progress. We ask how...
arXiv:2602.10480v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general-purpose reasoning capabilities, yet they frequently hallucinate when used as world models (WMs)...
arXiv:2608.22753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel at text understanding and generation, yet still struggle to reliably understand and apply externally provided proced...
Recursive reasoning models apply a small shared Transformer block many times to refine a latent state. This gives them large effective depth with few parameters and makes them strong on algorithmic ta...
Large language models can solve complex multi‑hop tasks but often fail on simple two‑hop queries, even when each hop is individually correct. In a controlled symbolic setting, the authors find that models generalize reliably when the second hop follows the training distribution, but always fail when it deviates. Mechanistic analysis shows that successful generalization relies on consistent intermediate representations across contexts, whereas failures arise from a mismatch between lower‑layer representation construction and upper‑layer mapping to outputs. The study proposes a recurrent‑style training strategy that improves out‑of‑distribution two‑hop generalization.
Flow Reasoning Models (FRMs) are a new framework that turns continuous flow models into efficient recurrent reasoners for structured tasks. By self‑conditioning a flow model on its own past outputs, FRMs iteratively refine solutions, allowing parallel decision making and revision. The authors introduce Fixed‑Point Forcing (FPF) to mitigate exposure bias at deeper recursion, and report near‑perfect solve rates on Sudoku‑Extreme, Zebra, and Maze‑Unique, outperforming existing masked‑diffusion and specialized baselines while using far fewer inference FLOPs.
arXiv:2606. 25450v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Traditional evaluations measure a learning algorithm's final performance on an i.