arXiv:2608.30795v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: End-to-end weather forecasting systems produce skillful global gridded and station forecasts directly from raw Earth observations, replacing the nume...
By Rodrigo Almeida, Noelia Otero, Jost Arndt, Simon Baur, Wojciech Samek, Jackie Ma
M$^2$Weather is a new benchmark for joint multi‑station and multi‑variable weather forecasting that gathers 2,809 high‑quality stations with five physically coupled weather variables across France, Europe, and the globe. The benchmark includes unified training and evaluation protocols and a lightweight adapter that can introduce missing station or variable relationships without retraining. Systematic evaluation of 16 models shows that jointly modeling station and variable relationships reduces mean‑squared error across all datasets.
By Rongwen Li, Xiao Wang, Mingyang Wang, Hongwu Liu, Changjian Chen, Zhuo Tang, Kenli Li
The note updates the Attention ResUNet hourly precipitation postprocessor, replacing 192 month‑ and lead‑specific models with a single season‑conditioned model using Feature‑wise Linear Modulation. Lead time is extended to 72 h and two new input channels—local solar hour and a monthly‑varying precipitation climatology—are added. Verification shows a modest, consistent improvement in Brier Skill Score and reliability compared to the previous training.
By Thomas M. Hamill
arXiv:2606. 02663v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in machine learning have produced probabilistic weather forecasting models comparable to state-of-the-art numerical weather predictors.
By Saptarishi Dhanuka (Ashoka University), Sarvesh Iyer (Ashoka University), Manmeet Singh (Western Kentucky University), Mihir More (Ashoka University), Rushil Gupta (Ashoka University), Dhruman Gupta (Ashoka University), Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay (Ashoka University), Sandeep Juneja (Ashoka University)
Data-driven models now rival numerical weather prediction in the medium range, but extending them to sub-seasonal lead times raises challenges absent at shorter horizons. Errors accumulate over long autoregressive rollouts, systematic biases grow with lead time, and several years of data must be held out for independent verification, even though machine-learning models otherwise benefit from longer training records.
The paper introduces Probabilistic Bias Correction (PBC), a machine learning framework that learns to correct historical probabilistic forecasts, thereby reducing systematic errors in subseasonal weather predictions. Applied to leading dynamical and AI models from ECMWF, PBC doubles the AI system’s modest subseasonal skill and improves the operationally-debiased dynamical model for most pressure, temperature, and precipitation targets. In ECMWF’s 2025 real‑time forecasting competition, PBC’s global forecasts ranked first across all weather variables and lead times, outperforming multiple operational and ensemble models.
By Hannah Guan, Soukayna Mouatadid, Paulo Orenstein, Judah Cohen, Haiyu Dong, Zekun Ni, Jeremy Berman, Genevieve Flaspohler, Alex Lu, Jakob Schloer, Joshua Talib, Jonathan A. Weyn, Lester Mackey
arXiv:2604. 16238v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decision-makers rely on weather forecasts to plant crops, manage wildfires, allocate water and energy, and prepare for weather extremes.
By Hannah Guan, Soukayna Mouatadid, Paulo Orenstein, Judah Cohen, Haiyu Dong, Zekun Ni, Jeremy Berman, Genevieve Flaspohler, Alex Lu, Jakob Schloer, Joshua Talib, Jonathan A. Weyn, Lester Mackey
The paper presents Laxmi, a retrained version of the AIFS weather model that uses satellite-based precipitation observations instead of ERA5 reanalysis data. Laxmi achieves a 19% improvement in global probabilistic accuracy, reduces drizzle overprediction by 33%, and boosts the 95th percentile Brier skill score by 57%. In a case study of 10 Indian tropical storms, Laxmi accurately forecasted 150 mm event-total precipitation in 7 events, outperforming both the original AIFS and the leading physical model IFS.
By Julian F. Schmitt, Bertrand Delorme, Robert C. King, Yashica Patodia, Tapio Schneider, Aditi Sheshadri, Ravi Jain
The study evaluates three machine‑learning weather‑prediction models—FourCastNet3, GraphCast, and the ECMWF High‑Resolution Forecast—for wind‑speed forecasting in Northern Norway using multi‑year station data. Results show the ECMWF model slightly outperforms the ML models (RMSE 2.89 m s⁻¹ vs. 2.96 m s⁻¹ for FourCastNet3 and 2.94 m s⁻¹ for GraphCast), yet all models maintain comparable performance beyond their training periods and underestimate strong winds. FourCastNet3 performs best under high‑wind conditions, indicating ML models are competitive with traditional numerical weather prediction but still need improvement for complex terrain.
By Siyan Chen, Lars Uebbing, Eirik Mikal Samuelsen, Georgios Leontidis, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, S\'ebastien Lef\`evre, Robert Jenssen, Kristoffer Wickstr{\o}m
arXiv:2611.06130v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Accurate short-term wind power forecasting is critical for grid stability and electricity trading. While transformer-based deep learning is state of th...
By Viktor Walter, Andreas Wagner
arXiv:2512.22814v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Accurate long-range weather forecasting remains a major challenge for AI models, both because errors accumulate over autoregressive rollouts and be...
By Scott A. Martin, Noah Brenowitz, Dale Durran, Michael Pritchard
arXiv:2607. 05100v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven models now rival numerical weather prediction in the medium range, but extending them to sub-seasonal lead times raises challenges absent at shorter horizons.
By Jakob Schloer, Steffen Tietsche, Christopher D. Roberts, Lorenzo Zampieri, Simon Lang, Gert Mertes, Gareth Jones, Matthew Chantry, Frederic Vitart