arXiv Computer Vision

Image Augmentation as Test Generation for Deep Learning-Based Image Retrieval Systems

The paper reviews 50 image augmentation and generation techniques, categorizing them into ten groups, and conducts a large‑scale empirical study to assess their effectiveness as test generators for embedding‑based image retrieval systems. Using Amazon Titan and OpenCLIP embeddings, the authors evaluate the techniques across four dimensions—embedding‑space similarity, embedding uncertainty, semantic realism, and retrieval failure rate—on CIFAR‑10, ImageNet‑1K, and an industrial dataset. Results show that weather simulation and SaSPA yield the highest uncertainty and failure rates while maintaining realistic visuals, whereas GAN‑based methods produce low realism due to synthetic artifacts.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 12

Improving Semantic Coverage in AI Test & Evaluation through Generative Augmentation

The paper introduces a three‑stage generative AI pipeline to identify and fill semantic gaps in AI test datasets without requiring labeled data. First, vision‑language models zero‑shot label semantic factors and clustering highlights those most impacting model behavior. Second, diffusion‑based image‑to‑image models generate new images that preserve scene content while adding underrepresented semantics. Third, statistical checks confirm improved coverage before the synthetic images augment the test set. The method is validated on image classification and object detection tasks, showing that enriched test sets better differentiate models with or without exposure to missing semantics, leading to conclusions that align more closely with an ideally covered dataset.

By Connor Hashemi, Bharadwaj Ravichandran, Connor Anderson, Shitij Govil, Brandon RichardWebster, Brian Hu, Keith Fieldhouse
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 23

Benchmarking the Alignment of Data-Quality Metrics, Human Judgment and Land-Cover Segmentation Performance for Earth Observation

Volume and quality of datasets are crucial for deep learning model training, yet they are often constrained by availability and data acquisition costs. Synthetic data augmentation can extend existing datasets with realistic images, and the quality of these images is generally assessed through fidelity metrics such as FID, KID, IS, LPIPS and SSIM that measure structural or distributional similarity.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

When Generated Images Look Right and Retrieve Wrong: Coverage-Guided Cross-Scale Re-Indexing for Knowledge-Faithful Generative Perception

arXiv:2608. 20810v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal information systems increasingly route generated visual content back through the same vision-language index that informed its production, so the output must remain retrievable by the queries it was meant to serve.

By Guangyuan Dong, Chuang Liu, Yangchen Zeng, Haoyu Wang, Xiaoyang Yu, Pinlong Zhao, Yuchao Hou, Ziwei Li, Zheng Lin
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

VLM2GeoVec: Toward Universal Multimodal Embeddings for Remote Sensing

The paper introduces RSMEB, a unified benchmark for remote‑sensing multimodal retrieval that evaluates both cross‑modal and interleaved retrieval across 21 tasks under a single ranking protocol. It also presents VLM2GeoVec, an instruction‑conditioned single‑encoder model that embeds image, text, bounding‑box, and geo‑coordinate tokens into one sequence and achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on region‑caption, referring‑expression, and semantic geo‑aware retrieval while remaining competitive on conventional tasks. The authors provide code, checkpoints, and data on GitHub to facilitate reproducibility.

By Emanuel S\'anchez Aimar, Gulnaz Zhambulova, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Yonghao Xu, Michael Felsberg
arXiv AI
Sep 1

When Images Look Right and Retrieve Wrong: Coverage-Guided Cross-Scale Re-Indexing for Knowledge-Faithful Generative Perception

The paper introduces CERES, a closed‑loop multimodal indexing framework that addresses semantic collapse in multimodal generation by building a three‑level semantic pyramid and using scale‑routed cross‑attention to generate images that remain retrievable by their original queries. CERES employs a co‑occurrence‑aware router, a lightweight U‑Net generator, and a soft‑Jaccard coverage objective to ensure generated images cover the intended concepts, verified by re‑indexing with a frozen vision‑language model and an external DINOv2 probe. Experiments on four pansharpening benchmarks show state‑of‑the‑art performance, especially under extreme scale variation, and significant improvements in concept‑query retrieval and image‑text ranking metrics.

By Guangyuan Dong, Chuang Liu, Haoyu Wang, Yangchen Zeng, Jiaqi Zhang, Li Jiuxing, Xiaoyang Yu, Pinlong Zhao, Yuchao Hou, Ziwei Li, Zheng Lin, Alexander Lim Han Yang, Yusen Wu
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

Multimodal Large Language Models as Image Classifiers

The paper investigates how evaluation protocols and ground‑truth quality affect the classification performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It identifies and corrects key issues such as discarded out‑of‑list outputs, inflated distractor choices, and poor open‑world mapping, and shows that design choices like batch size, image ordering, and text encoder selection significantly influence accuracy. Using a multilabel reannotation of 625 ImageNet‑1k classes (ReGT), the study finds that corrected labels can boost MLLM performance by up to 10.8%, narrowing the gap with supervised models, and demonstrates that MLLMs can assist human annotators in about half of difficult cases.

By Nikita Kisel, Illia Volkov, Klara Janouskova, Jiri Matas