PhoenixNest-Video is an evidence‑grounded multimodal agent designed for automated video interview assessment. It constructs a semantic video graph as working memory, retrieves information conditioned on rubrics across visual, audio, and textual streams, and outputs per‑criterion scores tied to the candidate’s materials. Trained with rubric‑based reinforcement learning, the system achieves 91.50% grade‑level accuracy on VInterview‑2025, outperforming larger proprietary models while providing traceable evidence for each score.
By Fan Yuxuan, Huang Miaojun, Zhang Haimei, Wu Jingshen, Liu Hao
arXiv:2606. 11930v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging problem in AI-assisted interview assessment because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.
By Kuo-En Hung, Hung-Yue Suen, Shih-Ching Yeh, Hsiang-Wen Wang
arXiv:2606. 11930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging multimodal learning problem because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals.
By Kuo-En Hung, Hung-Yue Suen, Shih-Ching Yeh, Hsiang-Wen Wang
The paper introduces ReTurn, a benchmark of 7,000 multimodal tasks designed to evaluate how models selectively use conversational history. ReTurn includes pairs that test task-carrying history (Reconfirm/Reground) and evidence-carrying history (Retrieve/Rebind), each preserving the same target question, media, and answer. Experiments on 13 vision‑language and audio‑language models show a drop in open‑ended accuracy from 93.7% to 72.3% when history is involved, revealing that high question recall does not guarantee effective task application and that competing media can misdirect responses.
By Shuoyang Sun, Kerui Gu, Hao Fang, Shaoli Huang, Bin Chen
arXiv:2604.01569v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Video multimodal large language models achieve strong results on existing benchmarks, but answer accuracy alone does not establish whether they can...
By Jiahao Meng, Yue Tan, Qi Xu, Haochen Wang, Zhongwei Ren, Weisong Liu, Yuhao Wang, Renrui Zhang, Xiangtai Li, Haodong Duan, Yunhai Tong, Ming-Hsuan Yang
EgoArgus is a new, human‑annotated dataset that tests visual‑language models (VLMs) as situational assistants in five everyday dialogue‑video scenarios. It evaluates how well VLMs understand and decide when to intervene, especially when visual and textual cues are helpful, irrelevant, or conflicting. The study finds that current VLMs still struggle to reliably act as egocentric assistants and that existing modality‑bias mitigation methods offer limited improvement.
By Yu-Chien Tang, Yu-Hsiang Liu, An-Zi Yen
EvaOmni is a new evidence‑grounded benchmark for audio‑visual reasoning, comprising 392 videos and 1,027 human‑annotated question‑answer pairs that span 15 capabilities and three difficulty levels. The benchmark requires models to provide both an answer and the supporting audio‑visual evidence intervals, and introduces Coverage Grounded (C.G.) and Bottleneck Grounded (B.G.) scores to evaluate evidence identification and temporal localization. Across 24 Omni LLMs, Gemini3.7‑Flash achieved the highest overall accuracy, yet its B.G. scores reveal significant room for improvement in grounded reasoning.
By Xiaoxing Hu, Wenxi Yao, Chaoyuan Shi, Ziqi Ye, Xiaorong Guo, Peixuan Li, Zhuoran Sun, Ziyang Gong, Peiyuan Zhang, Mingxin Liu, Shuran Ma, Hongbo Liu, Xiaomin Yu, Yu Tian, Wentao Wang, Zhenjie Yang, Jian Hu, Yunhang Shen, Haoyu Cao, Xue Yang
ANCHOR is a new benchmark for audio‑visually grounded chain‑of‑thought reasoning, containing 2,319 videos and 8,272 question‑answer pairs with structured reasoning traces, spatial bounding boxes, temporal intervals, and audio cues. It evaluates not only answer correctness but also hallucination, logical divergence, and conciseness, providing direct spatial and temporal grounding measurements on a focused subset. The benchmark reveals a substantial alignment gap among contemporary multimodal large language models, showing that similar answer accuracy can mask differences in evidence‑supported explanations.
By Joel Julin, Souraja Kundu, Liza Dahiya, George Z. Wei, Liuyue Xie, Jingru Yi, Xu Zhang, Hao Yang, Laszlo A. Jeni
arXiv:2606. 09064v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) have enabled performance on long-video understanding tasks.
By Shuning Wang, Zhiheng Wu, YiNuo Lu, Naiming Liu, Chen Jia, Bowen Liu, Shuo Nie, Weijie Zhu, Yumeng Zhang
The paper introduces CLEAR, a framework for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation that couples contextual representations with local discriminative cues. It replaces emotion label generation with continuous internal representations from a vision‑language model and trains a classifier on these representations. Sample‑adaptive residual coupling is used to integrate textual and acoustic evidence from the target utterance into the contextual representation, improving emotion recognition performance on IEMOCAP and MELD datasets.
By Linan Zhu, Zihao Zhai, Mengfei Xu, Xiao Han, Yuqian Fu, Xiangfan Chen, Zihang Zhang
arXiv:2608. 07512v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Asynchronous Video Interviews (AVIs) have become increasingly popular for personality assessment.
By Dongsheng Hu, Tianyi Zhang, Chuang Liu, Yuan Zong Yong Li, Wenming Zheng, Xiu-xiu Zhan
arXiv:2610.16260v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current ASR models perform well on general benchmarks but still struggle with acoustically ambiguous words. Visual context can aid recognition in scree...
By Mingwei Fu, Zheshu Song, Zhikai Zhou, Shen Huang, Shidong Shang, Mengxiao Zhu