arXiv Computation and Language

When History Helps and Hurts: Selective History Use across Multimodal Turns

The paper introduces ReTurn, a benchmark of 7,000 multimodal tasks designed to evaluate how models selectively use conversational history. ReTurn includes pairs that test task-carrying history (Reconfirm/Reground) and evidence-carrying history (Retrieve/Rebind), each preserving the same target question, media, and answer. Experiments on 13 vision‑language and audio‑language models show a drop in open‑ended accuracy from 93.7% to 72.3% when history is involved, revealing that high question recall does not guarantee effective task application and that competing media can misdirect responses.

arXiv AI
Sep 17

MIRAGE: How Conversation State Shapes Historical Evidence Use in Multimodal Personal Agents

MIRAGE is a controlled study that examines how multimodal personal agents use historical evidence when conversation state changes. The study keeps evidence, questions, and scoring constant while varying only the conversation state, then checks if agents can determine answerability, recover the correct source, and answer from it. Results across seven multimodal backbones show distinct failure regimes before and after compaction, heavy reliance on context continuity by open-weight models, and mixed effects of retrieval pressure on source attribution.

By Yu Liu, Wenxiao Zhang, Cheng Hu, Cong Cao, Fangfang Yuan, Xinyu Wang, Jin B. Hong, Yanbing Liu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

Omni Demand Understanding: A Benchmark for Contextual User-Intent Inference in Multimodal Interaction

The paper introduces Omni Demand Understanding (ODU), a benchmark designed to test whether multimodal models can infer a user's underlying demand from complex audio‑visual interactions. ODU requires models to detect the presence of a demand and infer intent using multimodal and conversational context, evaluated across single‑turn and multi‑turn scenarios. The authors built ODU‑Bench through a taxonomy‑guided approach, agentic video generation, and human‑recorded interactions, and found that even top models like Gemini 3.1 Pro recover only 44.7% of key information, with many models exhibiting high false‑trigger rates.

By Qi Chen, Yunfei Chu, Haolin He, Yifan Yang, Zihan Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Ziyang Ma, Ruiyang Xu, Meng Gao, Yinsong Yan, Ling Wang, Hui Wang, Wen Huang, Yiheng Chen, Guanrou Yang, Qiuqiang Kong, Jin Xu, Xie Chen
arXiv AI
Aug 19

Multi-turn Conversational AI from Text to Multimodal Interaction: Data, Models, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

The article surveys multi‑turn conversational AI, highlighting its shift from isolated text prompts to sustained, multimodal interactions that involve clarifying goals, revising requests, and switching topics. It reviews literature across text‑only dialogue, AudioLLMs, multimodal and omni‑modal systems, and tool‑augmented agents, organizing findings around datasets, models, training, evaluation, and cross‑cutting challenges. The analysis reveals that while multimodal perception and action have progressed rapidly, systems still struggle with persistent memory, cross‑turn grounding, full‑duplex interaction, robust evaluation, and cultural alignment.

By Syeda Faiza Ahmed, Zien Sheikh Ali, Hunzalah Hassan Bhatti, Firoj Alam, Shammur Absar Chowdhury
arXiv AI
Oct 2

SONIC-O1: A Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Audio-Video Understanding

SONIC‑O1 is a new benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models on audio‑video understanding. It contains 60 hours of 231 clips across 13 real‑world conversational domains, with 4,958 human‑verified annotations and demographic metadata. The benchmark tests open‑ended summarization, multiple‑choice question answering, and temporally grounded reasoning, revealing performance gaps between model families and across demographic groups.

By Ahmed Y. Radwan, Christos Emmanouilidis, Hina Tabassum, Deval Pandya, Shaina Raza
arXiv AI
Jun 9

IMUG-Bench: Benchmarking Unified Multimodal Models on Interleaved Understanding and Generation

arXiv:2606. 09169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In recent years, unified multimodal models (UMMs) have emerged to support both understanding and generation within a single framework.

By Lingyi Meng, Zecong Tang, Haoran Li, Tengju Ru, Zhejun Cui, Weitong Lian, Qi Kang, Hangshuo Cao, Yichen Zhu, Yechi Liu, Kaixuan Wang, Yu-Jie Yuan, Chunwei Wang, Yu Zhang, Bo Dai
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 5

CLIMB: Confidence-Guided Complementary Evidence for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

CLIMB is a training‑free inference‑time framework for multimodal retrieval‑augmented generation. It builds a compact complementary evidence pool using an MMR‑style objective that balances relevance and redundancy, then refines answers with a confidence‑controlled critic that scores relevance, specificity, and cross‑modal alignment. The method stops refinement when confidence no longer rises, improving performance on Encyclopedic‑VQA and InfoSeek without altering the retriever or language model.

By Hang Gao, Wujiang Xu, Zhixing Zhang, Kai Mei, Jingyi Yang, Dimitris N. Metaxas
arXiv AI
Sep 2

EM^2Mem: Event-Centric Multimodal Memory for Large Language Models

arXiv:2609.00551v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal memory offers a scalable interface for long-video question answering, but existing methods often retrieve captions, frames, transcripts, s...

By Yijun Chen, Yaqi Zheng, Yanya Li, Boyi Xiao, Buqiang Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Jizhan Fang, Xinle Deng, Yunzhi Yao, Xuehai Wang, Liuxin Zhang, Hui Li, Huajun Chen, Shumin Deng